Image-Editing Specialists: An RLAIF Approach for Diffusion Models

We present a novel approach to training specialized instruction-based image-editing diffusion models, addressing key challenges in structural preservation with input images and semantic alignment with user prompts. We introduce an online reinforcement learning framework that aligns the diffusion model with human preferences without relying on extensive human annotations or curating a large dataset. Our method significantly improves the realism and alignment with instructions in two ways. First, the proposed models achieve precise and structurally coherent modifications in complex scenes while maintaining high fidelity in instruction-irrelevant areas. Second, they capture fine nuances in the desired edit by leveraging a visual prompt, enabling detailed control over visual edits without lengthy textual prompts. This approach simplifies users' efforts to achieve highly specific edits, requiring only 5 reference images depicting a certain concept for training. Experimental results demonstrate that our models can perform intricate edits in complex scenes, after just 10 training steps. Finally, we showcase the versatility of our method by applying it to robotics, where enhancing the visual realism of simulated environments through targeted sim-to-real image edits improves their utility as proxies for real-world settings.

Harnessing Synthetic Datasets: The Role of Shape Bias in Deep Neural Network Generalization

Recent advancements in deep learning have been primarily driven by the use of large models trained on increasingly vast datasets. While neural scaling laws have emerged to predict network performance given a specific level of computational resources, the growing demand for expansive datasets raises concerns. To address this, a new research direction has emerged, focusing on the creation of synthetic data as a substitute. In this study, we investigate how neural networks exhibit shape bias during training on synthetic datasets, serving as an indicator of the synthetic data quality. Specifically, our findings indicate three key points: (1) Shape bias varies across network architectures and types of supervision, casting doubt on its reliability as a predictor for generalization and its ability to explain differences in model recognition compared to human capabilities. (2) Relying solely on shape bias to estimate generalization is unreliable, as it is entangled with diversity and naturalism. (3) We propose a novel interpretation of shape bias as a tool for estimating the diversity of samples within a dataset. Our research aims to clarify the implications of using synthetic data and its associated shape bias in deep learning, addressing concerns regarding generalization and dataset quality.