Abstract:With the utilization of Transformer architecture, large Vision and Language (V&L) models have shown promising performance in even zero-shot settings. Several studies, however, indicate a lack of robustness of the models when dealing with complex linguistics and visual attributes. In this work, we introduce a novel V&L benchmark - ColorFoil, by creating color-related foils to assess the models' perception ability to detect colors like red, white, green, etc. We evaluate seven state-of-the-art V&L models including CLIP, ViLT, GroupViT, and BridgeTower, etc. in a zero-shot setting and present intriguing findings from the V&L models. The experimental evaluation indicates that ViLT and BridgeTower demonstrate much better color perception capabilities compared to CLIP and its variants and GroupViT. Moreover, CLIP-based models and GroupViT struggle to distinguish colors that are visually distinct to humans with normal color perception ability.
Abstract:Byte pair encoding (BPE) emerges as an effective tokenization method for tackling the out-of-vocabulary (OOV) challenge in various natural language and speech processing tasks. Recent research highlights the dependency of BPE subword tokenization's efficacy on the morphological nature of the language, particularly in languages rich in inflectional morphology, where fewer BPE merges suffice for generating highly productive tokens. Motivated by this, our study empirically identifies the optimal number of BPE tokens for Bengali, a language known for its morphological complexity, thus enhancing out-of-distribution automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance. Experimental evaluation reveals that an excessively high number of BPE tokens can lead to overfitting, while approximately 500-1000 tokens result in superior OOV performance. Furthermore, we conduct a comparative analysis of BPE with character-based and unigram-based tokenization methods. By introducing BPE tokenization to Bengali ASR, we achieve a substantial reduction in the word error rate (WER) from 66.44% in our character-based baseline system to 63.80% on the LB-ASRTD eval set and from 46.34% to 42.80% on the SHRUTI eval set, both of which include out-of-distribution data.
Abstract:Handling and digesting a huge amount of information in an efficient manner has been a long-term demand in modern society. Some solutions to map key points (short textual summaries capturing essential information and filtering redundancies) to a large number of arguments/opinions have been provided recently (Bar-Haim et al., 2020). To complement the full picture of the argument-to-keypoint mapping task, we mainly propose two approaches in this paper. The first approach is to incorporate prompt engineering for fine-tuning the pre-trained language models (PLMs). The second approach utilizes prompt-based learning in PLMs to generate intermediary texts, which are then combined with the original argument-keypoint pairs and fed as inputs to a classifier, thereby mapping them. Furthermore, we extend the experiments to cross/in-domain to conduct an in-depth analysis. In our evaluation, we find that i) using prompt engineering in a more direct way (Approach 1) can yield promising results and improve the performance; ii) Approach 2 performs considerably worse than Approach 1 due to the negation issue of the PLM.
Abstract:The extent to which men and women use language differently has been questioned previously. Finding clear and consistent gender differences in language is not conclusive in general, and the research is heavily influenced by the context and method employed to identify the difference. In addition, the majority of the research was conducted in written form, and the sample was collected in writing. Therefore, we compared the word choices of male and female presenters in public addresses such as TED lectures. The frequency of numerous types of words, such as parts of speech (POS), linguistic, psychological, and cognitive terms were analyzed statistically to determine how male and female speakers use words differently. Based on our data, we determined that male speakers use specific types of linguistic, psychological, cognitive, and social words in considerably greater frequency than female speakers.
Abstract:The performance of data-driven natural language processing systems is contingent upon the quality of corpora. However, principal corpus design criteria are often not identified and examined adequately, particularly in the speech processing discipline. Speech corpora development requires additional attention with regard to clean/noisy, read/spontaneous, multi-talker speech, accents/dialects, etc. Domain selection is also a crucial decision point in speech corpus development. In this study, we demonstrate the significance of domain selection by assessing a state-of-the-art Bangla automatic speech recognition (ASR) model on a novel multi-domain Bangladeshi Bangla ASR evaluation benchmark - BanSpeech, which contains 7.2 hours of speech and 9802 utterances from 19 distinct domains. The ASR model has been trained with deep convolutional neural network (CNN), layer normalization technique, and Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss criterion on SUBAK.KO, a mostly read speech corpus for the low-resource and morphologically rich language Bangla. Experimental evaluation reveals the ASR model on SUBAK.KO faces difficulty recognizing speech from domains with mostly spontaneous speech and has a high number of out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words. The same ASR model, on the other hand, performs better in read speech domains and contains fewer OOV words. In addition, we report the outcomes of our experiments with layer normalization, input feature extraction, number of convolutional layers, etc., and set a baseline on SUBAK.KO. The BanSpeech will be publicly available to meet the need for a challenging evaluation benchmark for Bangla ASR.