Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Evaluating Causal Inference Models

The growing demand for personalized decision-making has led to a surge of interest in estimating the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE). The intersection of machine learning and causal inference has yielded various effective CATE estimators. However, deploying these estimators in practice is often hindered by the absence of counterfactual labels, making it challenging to select the desirable CATE estimator using conventional model selection procedures like cross-validation. Existing approaches for CATE estimator selection, such as plug-in and pseudo-outcome metrics, face two inherent challenges. Firstly, they are required to determine the metric form and the underlying machine learning models for fitting nuisance parameters or plug-in learners. Secondly, they lack a specific focus on selecting a robust estimator. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a novel approach, the Distributionally Robust Metric (DRM), for CATE estimator selection. The proposed DRM not only eliminates the need to fit additional models but also excels at selecting a robust CATE estimator. Experimental studies demonstrate the efficacy of the DRM method, showcasing its consistent effectiveness in identifying superior estimators while mitigating the risk of selecting inferior ones.