Cherry on Top: Parameter Heterogeneity and Quantization in Large Language Models

This paper reveals the phenomenon of parameter heterogeneity in large language models (LLMs). We find that a small subset of ``cherry'' parameters exhibit a disproportionately large influence on model performance, while the vast majority of parameters have minimal impact. This heterogeneity is found to be prevalent across different model families, scales, and types. Motivated by this observation, we propose CherryQ, a novel quantization method that unifies the optimization of mixed-precision parameters. CherryQ identifies and preserves the critical cherry parameters in high precision while aggressively quantizing the remaining parameters to low precision. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of CherryQ. CherryQ outperforms existing quantization approaches in terms of perplexity and downstream task performance. Notably, our 3-bit quantized Vicuna-1.5 exhibits competitive performance compared to their 16-bit counterparts. These findings highlight the potential of CherryQ for enabling efficient deployment of LLMs by taking advantage of parameter heterogeneity.

Who Said That? Benchmarking Social Media AI Detection

AI-generated text has proliferated across various online platforms, offering both transformative prospects and posing significant risks related to misinformation and manipulation. Addressing these challenges, this paper introduces SAID (Social media AI Detection), a novel benchmark developed to assess AI-text detection models' capabilities in real social media platforms. It incorporates real AI-generate text from popular social media platforms like Zhihu and Quora. Unlike existing benchmarks, SAID deals with content that reflects the sophisticated strategies employed by real AI users on the Internet which may evade detection or gain visibility, providing a more realistic and challenging evaluation landscape. A notable finding of our study, based on the Zhihu dataset, reveals that annotators can distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated texts with an average accuracy rate of 96.5%. This finding necessitates a re-evaluation of human capability in recognizing AI-generated text in today's widely AI-influenced environment. Furthermore, we present a new user-oriented AI-text detection challenge focusing on the practicality and effectiveness of identifying AI-generated text based on user information and multiple responses. The experimental results demonstrate that conducting detection tasks on actual social media platforms proves to be more challenging compared to traditional simulated AI-text detection, resulting in a decreased accuracy. On the other hand, user-oriented AI-generated text detection significantly improve the accuracy of detection.

Ada-Instruct: Adapting Instruction Generators for Complex Reasoning

Generating diverse and sophisticated instructions for downstream tasks by Large Language Models (LLMs) is pivotal for advancing the effect. Current approaches leverage closed-source LLMs, employing in-context prompting for instruction generation. However, in this paper, we found that in-context prompting cannot generate complex instructions with length $\ge 100$ for tasks like code completion. To solve this problem, we introduce Ada-Instruct, an adaptive instruction generator developed by fine-tuning open-source LLMs. Our pivotal finding illustrates that fine-tuning open-source LLMs with a mere ten samples generates long instructions that maintain distributional consistency for complex reasoning tasks. We empirically validated Ada-Instruct's efficacy across different applications, including code completion, mathematical reasoning, and commonsense reasoning. The results underscore Ada-Instruct's superiority, evidencing its improvements over its base models, current self-instruct methods, and other state-of-the-art models.

Evade ChatGPT Detectors via A Single Space

ChatGPT brings revolutionary social value but also raises concerns about the misuse of AI-generated content. Consequently, an important question is how to detect whether content is generated by ChatGPT or by human. Existing detectors are built upon the assumption that there are distributional gaps between human-generated and AI-generated content. These gaps are typically identified using statistical information or classifiers. Our research challenges the distributional gap assumption in detectors. We find that detectors do not effectively discriminate the semantic and stylistic gaps between human-generated and AI-generated content. Instead, the "subtle differences", such as an extra space, become crucial for detection. Based on this discovery, we propose the SpaceInfi strategy to evade detection. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this strategy across multiple benchmarks and detectors. We also provide a theoretical explanation for why SpaceInfi is successful in evading perplexity-based detection. Our findings offer new insights and challenges for understanding and constructing more applicable ChatGPT detectors.

Free Lunch for Efficient Textual Commonsense Integration in Language Models

Recent years have witnessed the emergence of textual commonsense knowledge bases, aimed at providing more nuanced and context-rich knowledge. The integration of external commonsense into language models has been shown to be a key enabler in advancing the state-of-the-art for a wide range of NLP tasks. However, incorporating textual commonsense descriptions is computationally expensive, as compared to encoding conventional symbolic knowledge. In this paper, we propose a method to improve its efficiency without modifying the model. We group training samples with similar commonsense descriptions into a single batch, thus reusing the encoded description across multiple samples. One key observation is that the upper bound of batch partitioning can be reduced to the classic {\it graph k-cut problem}. Consequently, we propose a spectral clustering-based algorithm to solve this problem. Extensive experiments illustrate that the proposed batch partitioning approach effectively reduces the computational cost while preserving performance. The efficiency improvement is more pronounced on larger datasets and on devices with more memory capacity, attesting to its practical utility for large-scale applications.

Exploring Automatically Perturbed Natural Language Explanations in Relation Extraction

Previous research has demonstrated that natural language explanations provide valuable inductive biases that guide models, thereby improving the generalization ability and data efficiency. In this paper, we undertake a systematic examination of the effectiveness of these explanations. Remarkably, we find that corrupted explanations with diminished inductive biases can achieve competitive or superior performance compared to the original explanations. Our findings furnish novel insights into the characteristics of natural language explanations in the following ways: (1) the impact of explanations varies across different training styles and datasets, with previously believed improvements primarily observed in frozen language models. (2) While previous research has attributed the effect of explanations solely to their inductive biases, our study shows that the effect persists even when the explanations are completely corrupted. We propose that the main effect is due to the provision of additional context space. (3) Utilizing the proposed automatic perturbed context, we were able to attain comparable results to annotated explanations, but with a significant increase in computational efficiency, 20-30 times faster.

Instance-based Learning for Knowledge Base Completion

In this paper, we propose a new method for knowledge base completion (KBC): instance-based learning (IBL). For example, to answer (Jill Biden, lived city,? ), instead of going directly to Washington D.C., our goal is to find Joe Biden, who has the same lived city as Jill Biden. Through prototype entities, IBL provides interpretability. We develop theories for modeling prototypes and combining IBL with translational models. Experiments on various tasks confirmed the IBL model's effectiveness and interpretability. In addition, IBL shed light on the mechanism of rule-based KBC models. Previous research has generally agreed that rule-based models provide rules with semantically compatible premises and hypotheses. We challenge this view. We begin by demonstrating that some logical rules represent {\it instance-based equivalence} (i.e. prototypes) rather than semantic compatibility. These are denoted as {\it IBL rules}. Surprisingly, despite occupying only a small portion of the rule space, IBL rules outperform non-IBL rules in all four benchmarks. We use a variety of experiments to demonstrate that rule-based models work because they have the ability to represent instance-based equivalence via IBL rules. The findings provide new insights of how rule-based models work and how to interpret their rules.

Open Rule Induction

Rules have a number of desirable properties. It is easy to understand, infer new knowledge, and communicate with other inference systems. One weakness of the previous rule induction systems is that they only find rules within a knowledge base (KB) and therefore cannot generalize to more open and complex real-world rules. Recently, the language model (LM)-based rule generation are proposed to enhance the expressive power of the rules. In this paper, we revisit the differences between KB-based rule induction and LM-based rule generation. We argue that, while KB-based methods inducted rules by discovering data commonalities, the current LM-based methods are "learning rules from rules". This limits these methods to only produce "canned" rules whose patterns are constrained by the annotated rules, while discarding the rich expressive power of LMs for free text. Therefore, in this paper, we propose the open rule induction problem, which aims to induce open rules utilizing the knowledge in LMs. Besides, we propose the Orion (\underline{o}pen \underline{r}ule \underline{i}nducti\underline{on}) system to automatically mine open rules from LMs without supervision of annotated rules. We conducted extensive experiments to verify the quality and quantity of the inducted open rules. Surprisingly, when applying the open rules in downstream tasks (i.e. relation extraction), these automatically inducted rules even outperformed the manually annotated rules.

Enhancing Language Models with Plug-and-Play Large-Scale Commonsense

We study how to enhance language models (LMs) with textual commonsense knowledge. Previous work (e.g., KnowBERT) has focused on the integrating entity knowledge from knowledge graphs. In order to introduce the external entity embeddings, they learn to jointly represent the original sentences and external knowledge by pre-training on a large scale corpus. However, when switching to textual commonsense, unlike the light entity embeddings, the encoding of commonsense descriptions is heavy. Therefore, the pre-training for learning to jointly represent the target sentence and external commonsense descriptions is unaffordable. On the other hand, since pre-trained LMs for representing the target sentences alone are readily available, is it feasible to introduce commonsense knowledge in downstream tasks by fine-tuning them only? In this paper, we propose a plug-and-play method for large-scale commonsense integration without pre-training. Our method is inspired by the observation that in the regular fine-tuning for downstream tasks where no external knowledge was introduced, the variation in the parameters of the language model was minor. Our method starts from a pre-trained LM that represents the target sentences only (e.g., BERT). We think that the pre-training for joint representation learning can be avoided, if the joint representation reduces the impact of parameters on the starting LM. Previous methods such as KnowBERT proposed complex modifications to the vanilla LM to introduce external knowledge. Our model (Cook-Transformer, COmmOnsense Knowledge-enhanced Transformer), on the other hand, hardly changes the vanilla LM except adding a knowledge token in each Transformer layer. In a variety of experiments, COOK-Transformer-based BERT/RoBERTa improve their effect without any pre-training.

Isotonic Data Augmentation for Knowledge Distillation

Knowledge distillation uses both real hard labels and soft labels predicted by teacher models as supervision. Intuitively, we expect the soft labels and hard labels to be concordant w.r.t. their orders of probabilities. However, we found critical order violations between hard labels and soft labels in augmented samples. For example, for an augmented sample $x=0.7*panda+0.3*cat$, we expect the order of meaningful soft labels to be $P_\text{soft}(panda|x)>P_\text{soft}(cat|x)>P_\text{soft}(other|x)$. But real soft labels usually violate the order, e.g. $P_\text{soft}(tiger|x)>P_\text{soft}(panda|x)>P_\text{soft}(cat|x)$. We attribute this to the unsatisfactory generalization ability of the teacher, which leads to the prediction error of augmented samples. Empirically, we found the violations are common and injure the knowledge transfer. In this paper, we introduce order restrictions to data augmentation for knowledge distillation, which is denoted as isotonic data augmentation (IDA). We use isotonic regression (IR) -- a classic technique from statistics -- to eliminate the order violations. We show that IDA can be modeled as a tree-structured IR problem. We thereby adapt the classical IRT-BIN algorithm for optimal solutions with $O(c \log c)$ time complexity, where $c$ is the number of labels. In order to further reduce the time complexity, we also propose a GPU-friendly approximation with linear time complexity. We have verified on variant datasets and data augmentation techniques that our proposed IDA algorithms effectively increases the accuracy of knowledge distillation by eliminating the rank violations.