Flying a Quadrotor with Unknown Actuators and Sensor Configuration

Though control algorithms for multirotor Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) are well understood, the configuration, parameter estimation, and tuning of flight control algorithms takes quite some time and resources. In previous work, we have shown that it is possible to identify the control effectiveness and motor dynamics of a multirotor fast enough for it to recover to a stable hover after being thrown 4 meters in the air. In this paper, we extend this to include estimation of the position of the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) relative to the Center of Gravity (CoG), estimation of the IMU rotation, the thrust direction of all motors and the optimal combined thrust direction. In order to guarantee a correct IMU position estimation, two prior throw-and-catches of the vehicle with spin around different axes are required. For these throws, a height as low as 1 meter is sufficient. Quadrotor flight experimentation confirms the efficacy of the approach, and a simulation shows its applicability to fully-actuated crafts with multiple possible hover orientations.

Control of Unknown Quadrotors from a Single Throw

This paper presents a method to recover quadrotor UAV from a throw, when no control parameters are known before the throw. We leverage the availability of high-frequency rotor speed feedback available in racing drone hardware and software to find control effectiveness values and fit a motor model using recursive least squares (RLS) estimation. Furthermore, we propose an excitation sequence that provides large actuation commands while guaranteeing to stay within gyroscope sensing limits. After 450ms of excitation, an INDI attitude controller uses the 52 fitted parameters to arrest rotational motion and recover an upright attitude. Finally, a NDI position controller drives the craft to a position setpoint. The proposed algorithm runs efficiently on microcontrollers found in common UAV flight controllers, and was shown to recover an agile quadrotor every time in 57 live experiments with as low as 3.5m throw height, demonstrating robustness against initial rotations and noise. We also demonstrate control of randomized quadrotors in simulated throws, where the parameter fitting RMS error is typically within 10% of the true value.