Virtual reservoir acceleration for CPU and GPU: Case study for coupled spin-torque oscillator reservoir

We provide high-speed implementations for simulating reservoirs described by $N$-coupled spin-torque oscillators. Here $N$ also corresponds to the number of reservoir nodes. We benchmark a variety of implementations based on CPU and GPU. Our new methods are at least 2.6 times quicker than the baseline for $N$ in range $1$ to $10^4$. More specifically, over all implementations the best factor is 78.9 for $N=1$ which decreases to 2.6 for $N=10^3$ and finally increases to 23.8 for $N=10^4$. GPU outperforms CPU significantly at $N=2500$. Our results show that GPU implementations should be tested for reservoir simulations. The implementations considered here can be used for any reservoir with evolution that can be approximated using an explicit method.

How neural networks learn to classify chaotic time series

Neural networks are increasingly employed to model, analyze and control non-linear dynamical systems ranging from physics to biology. Owing to their universal approximation capabilities, they regularly outperform state-of-the-art model-driven methods in terms of accuracy, computational speed, and/or control capabilities. On the other hand, neural networks are very often they are taken as black boxes whose explainability is challenged, among others, by huge amounts of trainable parameters. In this paper, we tackle the outstanding issue of analyzing the inner workings of neural networks trained to classify regular-versus-chaotic time series. This setting, well-studied in dynamical systems, enables thorough formal analyses. We focus specifically on a family of networks dubbed Large Kernel Convolutional Neural Networks (LKCNN), recently introduced by Boull\'{e} et al. (2021). These non-recursive networks have been shown to outperform other established architectures (e.g. residual networks, shallow neural networks and fully convolutional networks) at this classification task. Furthermore, they outperform ``manual'' classification approaches based on direct reconstruction of the Lyapunov exponent. We find that LKCNNs use qualitative properties of the input sequence. In particular, we show that the relation between input periodicity and activation periodicity is key for the performance of LKCNN models. Low performing models show, in fact, analogous periodic activations to random untrained models. This could give very general criteria for identifying, a priori, trained models that have poor accuracy.