LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This

As Large Language Models become more ubiquitous across domains, it becomes important to examine their inherent limitations critically. This work argues that hallucinations in language models are not just occasional errors but an inevitable feature of these systems. We demonstrate that hallucinations stem from the fundamental mathematical and logical structure of LLMs. It is, therefore, impossible to eliminate them through architectural improvements, dataset enhancements, or fact-checking mechanisms. Our analysis draws on computational theory and Godel's First Incompleteness Theorem, which references the undecidability of problems like the Halting, Emptiness, and Acceptance Problems. We demonstrate that every stage of the LLM process-from training data compilation to fact retrieval, intent classification, and text generation-will have a non-zero probability of producing hallucinations. This work introduces the concept of Structural Hallucination as an intrinsic nature of these systems. By establishing the mathematical certainty of hallucinations, we challenge the prevailing notion that they can be fully mitigated.

Machine Fault Classification using Hamiltonian Neural Networks

A new approach is introduced to classify faults in rotating machinery based on the total energy signature estimated from sensor measurements. The overall goal is to go beyond using black-box models and incorporate additional physical constraints that govern the behavior of mechanical systems. Observational data is used to train Hamiltonian neural networks that describe the conserved energy of the system for normal and various abnormal regimes. The estimated total energy function, in the form of the weights of the Hamiltonian neural network, serves as the new feature vector to discriminate between the faults using off-the-shelf classification models. The experimental results are obtained using the MaFaulDa database, where the proposed model yields a promising area under the curve (AUC) of $0.78$ for the binary classification (normal vs abnormal) and $0.84$ for the multi-class problem (normal, and $5$ different abnormal regimes).