S-RASTER: Contraction Clustering for Evolving Data Streams

Contraction Clustering (RASTER) is a very fast algorithm for density-based clustering, which requires only a single pass. It can process arbitrary amounts of data in linear time and in constant memory, quickly identifying approximate clusters. It also exhibits good scalability in the presence of multiple CPU cores. Yet, RASTER is limited to batch processing. In contrast, S-RASTER is an adaptation of RASTER to the stream processing paradigm that is able to identify clusters in evolving data streams. This algorithm retains the main benefits of its parent algorithm, i.e. single-pass linear time cost and constant memory requirements for each discrete time step in the sliding window. The sliding window is efficiently pruned, and clustering is still performed in linear time. Like RASTER, S-RASTER trades off an often negligible amount of precision for speed. It is therefore very well suited to real-world scenarios where clustering does not happen continually but only periodically. We describe the algorithm, including a discussion of implementation details.

Contraction Clustering : A Very Fast Big Data Algorithm for Sequential and Parallel Density-Based Clustering in Linear Time, Constant Memory, and a Single Pass

Clustering is an essential data mining tool for analyzing and grouping similar objects. In big data applications, however, many clustering algorithms are infeasible due to their high memory requirements and/or unfavorable runtime complexity. In contrast, Contraction Clustering (RASTER) is a single-pass algorithm for identifying density-based clusters with linear time complexity. Due to its favorable runtime and the fact that its memory requirements are constant, this algorithm is highly suitable for big data applications where the amount of data to be processed is huge. It consists of two steps: (1) a contraction step which projects objects onto tiles and (2) an agglomeration step which groups tiles into clusters. This algorithm is extremely fast in both sequential and parallel execution. In single-threaded execution on a contemporary workstation, an implementation in Rust processes a batch of 500 million points with 1 million clusters in less than 50 seconds. The speedup due to parallelization is significant, amounting to a factor of around 4 on an 8-core machine.