When Are Bias-Free ReLU Networks Like Linear Networks?

We investigate the expressivity and learning dynamics of bias-free ReLU networks. We firstly show that two-layer bias-free ReLU networks have limited expressivity: the only odd function two-layer bias-free ReLU networks can express is a linear one. We then show that, under symmetry conditions on the data, these networks have the same learning dynamics as linear networks. This allows us to give closed-form time-course solutions to certain two-layer bias-free ReLU networks, which has not been done for nonlinear networks outside the lazy learning regime. While deep bias-free ReLU networks are more expressive than their two-layer counterparts, they still share a number of similarities with deep linear networks. These similarities enable us to leverage insights from linear networks, leading to a novel understanding of bias-free ReLU networks. Overall, our results show that some properties established for bias-free ReLU networks arise due to equivalence to linear networks, and suggest that including bias or considering asymmetric data are avenues to engage with nonlinear behaviors.

A Theory of Unimodal Bias in Multimodal Learning

Using multiple input streams simultaneously in training multimodal neural networks is intuitively advantageous, but practically challenging. A key challenge is unimodal bias, where a network overly relies on one modality and ignores others during joint training. While unimodal bias is well-documented empirically, our theoretical understanding of how architecture and data statistics influence this bias remains incomplete. Here we develop a theory of unimodal bias with deep multimodal linear networks. We calculate the duration of the unimodal phase in learning as a function of the depth at which modalities are fused within the network, dataset statistics, and initialization. We find that the deeper the layer at which fusion occurs, the longer the unimodal phase. A long unimodal phase can lead to a generalization deficit and permanent unimodal bias in the overparametrized regime. In addition, our theory reveals the modality learned first is not necessarily the modality that contributes more to the output. Our results, derived for multimodal linear networks, extend to ReLU networks in certain settings. Taken together, this work illuminates pathologies of multimodal learning under joint training, showing that late and intermediate fusion architectures can give rise to long unimodal phases and permanent unimodal bias.

Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisation

The training of sparse neural networks is becoming an increasingly important tool for reducing the computational footprint of models at training and evaluation, as well enabling the effective scaling up of models. Whereas much work over the years has been dedicated to specialised pruning techniques, little attention has been paid to the inherent effect of gradient based training on model sparsity. In this work, we introduce Powerpropagation, a new weight-parameterisation for neural networks that leads to inherently sparse models. Exploiting the behaviour of gradient descent, our method gives rise to weight updates exhibiting a "rich get richer" dynamic, leaving low-magnitude parameters largely unaffected by learning. Models trained in this manner exhibit similar performance, but have a distribution with markedly higher density at zero, allowing more parameters to be pruned safely. Powerpropagation is general, intuitive, cheap and straight-forward to implement and can readily be combined with various other techniques. To highlight its versatility, we explore it in two very different settings: Firstly, following a recent line of work, we investigate its effect on sparse training for resource-constrained settings. Here, we combine Powerpropagation with a traditional weight-pruning technique as well as recent state-of-the-art sparse-to-sparse algorithms, showing superior performance on the ImageNet benchmark. Secondly, we advocate the use of sparsity in overcoming catastrophic forgetting, where compressed representations allow accommodating a large number of tasks at fixed model capacity. In all cases our reparameterisation considerably increases the efficacy of the off-the-shelf methods.

Towards Biologically Plausible Convolutional Networks

Convolutional networks are ubiquitous in deep learning. They are particularly useful for images, as they reduce the number of parameters, reduce training time, and increase accuracy. However, as a model of the brain they are seriously problematic, since they require weight sharing - something real neurons simply cannot do. Consequently, while neurons in the brain can be locally connected (one of the features of convolutional networks), they cannot be convolutional. Locally connected but non-convolutional networks, however, significantly underperform convolutional ones. This is troublesome for studies that use convolutional networks to explain activity in the visual system. Here we study plausible alternatives to weight sharing that aim at the same regularization principle, which is to make each neuron within a pool react similarly to identical inputs. The most natural way to do that is by showing the network multiple translations of the same image, akin to saccades in animal vision. However, this approach requires many translations, and doesn't remove the performance gap. We propose instead to add lateral connectivity to a locally connected network, and allow learning via Hebbian plasticity. This requires the network to pause occasionally for a sleep-like phase of "weight sharing". This method enables locally connected networks to achieve nearly convolutional performance on ImageNet, thus supporting convolutional networks as a model of the visual stream.

Kernelized information bottleneck leads to biologically plausible 3-factor Hebbian learning in deep networks

The state-of-the art machine learning approach to training deep neural networks, backpropagation, is implausible for real neural networks: neurons need to know their outgoing weights; training alternates between a forward pass (computation) and a backward pass (learning); and the algorithm needs a large amount of labeled data. Biologically plausible approximations to backpropagation, such as feedback alignment, solve the weight transport problem, but not the other two. Thus, fully biologically plausible learning rules have so far remained elusive. Here we present a family of learning rules that does not suffer from any of these problems. It is motivated by the information bottleneck principle (extended with kernel methods), in which networks learn to squeeze as much information as possible out of the input without sacrificing prediction of the output. The resulting rules have a 3-factor Hebbian structure: they require pre- and post-synaptic firing rates and a global error signal - the third factor - that can be supplied by a neuromodulator. Moreover, they do not require precise labels; instead, they rely on the similarity between the desired outputs. They thus solve all three implausibility issues of backpropagation. Moreover, to obtain good performance on hard problems and retain biologically plausible learning rules, our rules need divisive normalization - a known feature of biological networks. Finally, simulations show that our rule performs nearly as well as backpropagation on image classification tasks.