Evaluating OCR Performance for Assistive Technology: Effects of Walking Speed, Camera Placement, and Camera Type

Optical character recognition (OCR), which converts printed or handwritten text into machine-readable form, is widely used in assistive technology for people with blindness and low vision. Yet, most evaluations rely on static datasets that do not reflect the challenges of mobile use. In this study, we systematically evaluated OCR performance under both static and dynamic conditions. Static tests measured detection range across distances of 1-7 meters and viewing angles of 0-75 degrees horizontally. Dynamic tests examined the impact of motion by varying walking speed from slow (0.8 m/s) to very fast (1.8 m/s) and comparing three camera mounting positions: head-mounted, shoulder-mounted, and hand-held. We evaluated both a smartphone and smart glasses, using the phone's main and ultra-wide cameras. Four OCR engines were benchmarked to assess accuracy at different distances and viewing angles: Google Vision, PaddleOCR 3.0, EasyOCR, and Tesseract. PaddleOCR 3.0 was then used to evaluate accuracy at different walking speeds. Accuracy was computed at the character level using the Levenshtein ratio against manually defined ground truth. Results showed that recognition accuracy declined with increased walking speed and wider viewing angles. Google Vision achieved the highest overall accuracy, with PaddleOCR close behind as the strongest open-source alternative. Across devices, the phone's main camera achieved the highest accuracy, and a shoulder-mounted placement yielded the highest average among body positions; however, differences among shoulder, head, and hand were not statistically significant.

Robust Computer-Vision based Construction Site Detection for Assistive-Technology Applications

Navigating urban environments poses significant challenges for people with disabilities, particularly those with blindness and low vision. Environments with dynamic and unpredictable elements like construction sites are especially challenging. Construction sites introduce hazards like uneven surfaces, obstructive barriers, hazardous materials, and excessive noise, and they can alter routing, complicating safe mobility. Existing assistive technologies are limited, as navigation apps do not account for construction sites during trip planning, and detection tools that attempt hazard recognition struggle to address the extreme variability of construction paraphernalia. This study introduces a novel computer vision-based system that integrates open-vocabulary object detection, a YOLO-based scaffolding-pole detection model, and an optical character recognition (OCR) module to comprehensively identify and interpret construction site elements for assistive navigation. In static testing across seven construction sites, the system achieved an overall accuracy of 88.56\%, reliably detecting objects from 2m to 10m within a 0$^\circ$ -- 75$^\circ$ angular offset. At closer distances (2--4m), the detection rate was 100\% at all tested angles. At