Does Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Help Mobile GUI Agent? An Empirical Study

Reasoning capabilities have significantly improved the performance of vision-language models (VLMs) in domains such as mathematical problem-solving, coding, and visual question-answering. However, their impact on real-world applications remains unclear. This paper presents the first empirical study on the effectiveness of reasoning-enabled VLMs in mobile GUI agents, a domain that requires interpreting complex screen layouts, understanding user instructions, and executing multi-turn interactions. We evaluate two pairs of commercial models--Gemini 2.0 Flash and Claude 3.7 Sonnet--comparing their base and reasoning-enhanced versions across two static benchmarks (ScreenSpot and AndroidControl) and one interactive environment (AndroidWorld). We surprisingly find the Claude 3.7 Sonnet reasoning model achieves state-of-the-art performance on AndroidWorld. However, reasoning VLMs generally offer marginal improvements over non-reasoning models on static benchmarks and even degrade performance in some agent setups. Notably, reasoning and non-reasoning VLMs fail on different sets of tasks, suggesting that reasoning does have an impact, but its benefits and drawbacks counterbalance each other. We attribute these inconsistencies to the limitations of benchmarks and VLMs. Based on the findings, we provide insights for further enhancing mobile GUI agents in terms of benchmarks, VLMs, and their adaptability in dynamically invoking reasoning VLMs. The experimental data are publicly available at https://github.com/LlamaTouch/VLM-Reasoning-Traces.

LlamaTouch: A Faithful and Scalable Testbed for Mobile UI Automation Task Evaluation

The emergent large language/multimodal models facilitate the evolution of mobile agents, especially in the task of mobile UI automation. However, existing evaluation approaches, which rely on human validation or established datasets to compare agent-predicted actions with predefined ones, are unscalable and unfaithful. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents LlamaTouch, a testbed for on-device agent execution and faithful, scalable agent evaluation. By observing that the task execution process only transfers UI states, LlamaTouch employs a novel evaluation approach that only assesses whether an agent traverses all manually annotated, essential application/system states. LlamaTouch comprises three key techniques: (1) On-device task execution that enables mobile agents to interact with real mobile environments for task completion. (2) Fine-grained UI component annotation that merges pixel-level screenshots and textual screen hierarchies to explicitly identify and precisely annotate essential UI components with a rich set of designed annotation primitives. (3) A multi-level state matching algorithm that utilizes exact and fuzzy matching to accurately detect critical information in each screen with unpredictable UI layout/content dynamics. LlamaTouch currently incorporates four mobile agents and 495 UI automation tasks, encompassing both tasks in the widely-used datasets and our self-constructed ones for more diverse mobile applications. Evaluation results demonstrate the LlamaTouch's high faithfulness of evaluation in real environments and its better scalability than human validation. LlamaTouch also enables easy task annotation and integration of new mobile agents. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/LlamaTouch/LlamaTouch.