Design Principles for Generalization and Scalability of AI in Communication Systems

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool for addressing complex and dynamic tasks in communication systems, where traditional rule-based algorithms often struggle. However, most AI applications to networking tasks are designed and trained for specific, limited conditions, hindering the algorithms from learning and adapting to generic situations, such as those met across radio access networks (RAN). This paper proposes design principles for sustainable and scalable AI integration in communication systems, focusing on creating AI algorithms that can generalize across network environments, intents, and control tasks. This approach enables a limited number of AI-driven RAN functions to tackle larger problems, improve system performance, and simplify lifecycle management. To achieve sustainability and automation, we introduce a scalable learning architecture that supports all deployed AI applications in the system. This architecture separates centralized learning functionalities from distributed actuation and inference functions, enabling efficient data collection and management, computational and storage resources optimization, and cost reduction. We illustrate these concepts by designing a generalized link adaptation algorithm, demonstrating the benefits of our proposed approach.

DeepCAS: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Control-Aware Scheduling

We consider networked control systems consisting of multiple independent controlled subsystems, operating over a shared communication network. Such systems are ubiquitous in cyber-physical systems, Internet of Things, and large-scale industrial systems. In many large-scale settings, the size of the communication network is smaller than the size of the system. In consequence, scheduling issues arise. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a deep reinforcement learning-based \emph{control-aware} scheduling (\textsc{DeepCAS}) algorithm to tackle these issues. We use the following (optimal) design strategy: First, we synthesize an optimal controller for each subsystem; next, we design a learning algorithm that adapts to the chosen subsystems (plants) and controllers. As a consequence of this adaptation, our algorithm finds a schedule that minimizes the \emph{control loss}. We present empirical results to show that \textsc{DeepCAS} finds schedules with better performance than periodic ones.