DART: An AIGT Detector using AMR of Rephrased Text

As large language models (LLMs) generate more human-like texts, concerns about the side effects of AI-generated texts (AIGT) have grown. So, researchers have developed methods for detecting AIGT. However, two challenges remain. First, the performance on detecting black-box LLMs is low, because existing models have focused on syntactic features. Second, most AIGT detectors have been tested on a single-candidate setting, which assumes that we know the origin of an AIGT and may deviate from the real-world scenario. To resolve these challenges, we propose DART, which consists of four steps: rephrasing, semantic parsing, scoring, and multiclass classification. We conducted several experiments to test the performance of DART by following previous work. The experimental result shows that DART can discriminate multiple black-box LLMs without using syntactic features and knowing the origin of AIGT.

Leveraging Large Language Models for Active Merchant Non-player Characters

We highlight two significant issues leading to the passivity of current merchant non-player characters (NPCs): pricing and communication. While immersive interactions have been a focus, negotiations between merchant NPCs and players on item prices have not received sufficient attention. First, we define passive pricing as the limited ability of merchants to modify predefined item prices. Second, passive communication means that merchants can only interact with players in a scripted manner. To tackle these issues and create an active merchant NPC, we propose a merchant framework based on large language models (LLMs), called MART, which consists of an appraiser module and a negotiator module. We conducted two experiments to guide game developers in selecting appropriate implementations by comparing different training methods and LLM sizes. Our findings indicate that finetuning methods, such as supervised finetuning (SFT) and knowledge distillation (KD), are effective in using smaller LLMs to implement active merchant NPCs. Additionally, we found three irregular cases arising from the responses of LLMs. We expect our findings to guide developers in using LLMs for developing active merchant NPCs.

Does chat change LLM's mind? Impact of Conversation on Psychological States of LLMs

The recent growth of large language models (LLMs) has enabled more authentic, human-centered interactions through multi-agent systems. However, investigation into how conversations affect the psychological states of LLMs is limited, despite the impact of these states on the usability of LLM-based systems. In this study, we explored whether psychological states change during multi-agent interactions, focusing on the effects of conversation depth, topic, and speaker. We experimentally investigated the behavior of 10 LLMs in open-domain conversations. We employed 14 questionnaires and a topic-analysis method to examine the behavior of LLMs across four aspects: personality, interpersonal relationships, motivation, and emotion. The results revealed distinct psychological trends influenced by conversation depth and topic, with significant variations observed between different LLM families and parameter sizes.

Microscopic Analysis on LLM players via Social Deduction Game

Recent studies have begun developing autonomous game players for social deduction games using large language models (LLMs). When building LLM players, fine-grained evaluations are crucial for addressing weaknesses in game-playing abilities. However, existing studies have often overlooked such assessments. Specifically, we point out two issues with the evaluation methods employed. First, game-playing abilities have typically been assessed through game-level outcomes rather than specific event-level skills; Second, error analyses have lacked structured methodologies. To address these issues, we propose an approach utilizing a variant of the SpyFall game, named SpyGame. We conducted an experiment with four LLMs, analyzing their gameplay behavior in SpyGame both quantitatively and qualitatively. For the quantitative analysis, we introduced eight metrics to resolve the first issue, revealing that these metrics are more effective than existing ones for evaluating the two critical skills: intent identification and camouflage. In the qualitative analysis, we performed thematic analysis to resolve the second issue. This analysis identifies four major categories that affect gameplay of LLMs. Additionally, we demonstrate how these categories complement and support the findings from the quantitative analysis.