Multi-role Consensus through LLMs Discussions for Vulnerability Detection

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have highlighted the potential for vulnerability detection, a crucial component of software quality assurance. Despite this progress, most studies have been limited to the perspective of a single role, usually testers, lacking diverse viewpoints from different roles in a typical software development life-cycle, including both developers and testers. To this end, this paper introduces an approach to employ LLMs to act as different roles to simulate real-life code review process, engaging in discussions towards a consensus on the existence and classification of vulnerabilities in the code. Preliminary evaluation of the proposed approach indicates a 4.73% increase in the precision rate, 58.9% increase in the recall rate, and a 28.1% increase in the F1 score.