Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique

A key development in the cybersecurity evaluations space is the work carried out by Meta, through their CyberSecEval approach. While this work is undoubtedly a useful contribution to a nascent field, there are notable features that limit its utility. Key drawbacks focus on the insecure code detection part of Meta's methodology. We explore these limitations, and use our exploration as a test case for LLM-assisted benchmark analysis.

Extracting Paragraphs from LLM Token Activations

Generative large language models (LLMs) excel in natural language processing tasks, yet their inner workings remain underexplored beyond token-level predictions. This study investigates the degree to which these models decide the content of a paragraph at its onset, shedding light on their contextual understanding. By examining the information encoded in single-token activations, specifically the "\textbackslash n\textbackslash n" double newline token, we demonstrate that patching these activations can transfer significant information about the context of the following paragraph, providing further insights into the model's capacity to plan ahead.