What is the $\textit{intrinsic}$ dimension of your binary data? -- and how to compute it quickly

Dimensionality is an important aspect for analyzing and understanding (high-dimensional) data. In their 2006 ICDM paper Tatti et al. answered the question for a (interpretable) dimension of binary data tables by introducing a normalized correlation dimension. In the present work we revisit their results and contrast them with a concept based notion of intrinsic dimension (ID) recently introduced for geometric data sets. To do this, we present a novel approximation for this ID that is based on computing concepts only up to a certain support value. We demonstrate and evaluate our approximation using all available datasets from Tatti et al., which have between 469 and 41271 extrinsic dimensions.

Reproducibility and Geometric Intrinsic Dimensionality: An Investigation on Graph Neural Network Research

Difficulties in replication and reproducibility of empirical evidences in machine learning research have become a prominent topic in recent years. Ensuring that machine learning research results are sound and reliable requires reproducibility, which verifies the reliability of research findings using the same code and data. This promotes open and accessible research, robust experimental workflows, and the rapid integration of new findings. Evaluating the degree to which research publications support these different aspects of reproducibility is one goal of the present work. For this we introduce an ontology of reproducibility in machine learning and apply it to methods for graph neural networks. Building on these efforts we turn towards another critical challenge in machine learning, namely the curse of dimensionality, which poses challenges in data collection, representation, and analysis, making it harder to find representative data and impeding the training and inference processes. Using the closely linked concept of geometric intrinsic dimension we investigate to which extend the used machine learning models are influenced by the intrinsic dimension of the data sets they are trained on.

Selecting Features by their Resilience to the Curse of Dimensionality

Real-world datasets are often of high dimension and effected by the curse of dimensionality. This hinders their comprehensibility and interpretability. To reduce the complexity feature selection aims to identify features that are crucial to learn from said data. While measures of relevance and pairwise similarities are commonly used, the curse of dimensionality is rarely incorporated into the process of selecting features. Here we step in with a novel method that identifies the features that allow to discriminate data subsets of different sizes. By adapting recent work on computing intrinsic dimensionalities, our method is able to select the features that can discriminate data and thus weaken the curse of dimensionality. Our experiments show that our method is competitive and commonly outperforms established feature selection methods. Furthermore, we propose an approximation that allows our method to scale to datasets consisting of millions of data points. Our findings suggest that features that discriminate data and are connected to a low intrinsic dimensionality are meaningful for learning procedures.