Language Models as Science Tutors

NLP has recently made exciting progress toward training language models (LMs) with strong scientific problem-solving skills. However, model development has not focused on real-life use-cases of LMs for science, including applications in education that require processing long scientific documents. To address this, we introduce TutorEval and TutorChat. TutorEval is a diverse question-answering benchmark consisting of questions about long chapters from STEM textbooks, written by experts. TutorEval helps measure real-life usability of LMs as scientific assistants, and it is the first benchmark combining long contexts, free-form generation, and multi-disciplinary scientific knowledge. Moreover, we show that fine-tuning base models with existing dialogue datasets leads to poor performance on TutorEval. Therefore, we create TutorChat, a dataset of 80,000 long synthetic dialogues about textbooks. We use TutorChat to fine-tune Llemma models with 7B and 34B parameters. These LM tutors specialized in math have a 32K-token context window, and they excel at TutorEval while performing strongly on GSM8K and MATH. Our datasets build on open-source materials, and we release our models, data, and evaluations.

Scattering with Neural Operators

Recent advances in machine learning establish the ability of certain neural-network architectures called neural operators to approximate maps between function spaces. Motivated by a prospect of employing them in fundamental physics, we examine applications to scattering processes in quantum mechanics. We use an iterated variant of Fourier neural operators to learn the physics of Schr\"odinger operators, which map from the space of initial wave functions and potentials to the final wave functions. These deep operator learning ideas are put to test in two concrete problems: a neural operator predicting the time evolution of a wave packet scattering off a central potential in $1+1$ dimensions, and the double-slit experiment in $2+1$ dimensions. At inference, neural operators can become orders of magnitude more efficient compared to traditional finite-difference solvers.