Abstract:The energy-conserving sampling and weighting (ECSW) method is a hyperreduction method originally developed for accelerating the performance of Galerkin projection-based reduced-order models (PROMs) associated with large-scale finite element models, when the underlying projected operators need to be frequently recomputed as in parametric and/or nonlinear problems. In this paper, this hyperreduction method is extended to Petrov-Galerkin PROMs where the underlying high-dimensional models can be associated with arbitrary finite element, finite volume, and finite difference semi-discretization methods. Its scope is also extended to cover local PROMs based on piecewise-affine approximation subspaces, such as those designed for mitigating the Kolmogorov $n$-width barrier issue associated with convection-dominated flow problems. The resulting ECSW method is shown in this paper to be robust and accurate. In particular, its offline phase is shown to be fast and parallelizable, and the potential of its online phase for large-scale applications of industrial relevance is demonstrated for turbulent flow problems with $O(10^7)$ and $O(10^8)$ degrees of freedom. For such problems, the online part of the ECSW method proposed in this paper for Petrov-Galerkin PROMs is shown to enable wall-clock time and CPU time speedup factors of several orders of magnitude while delivering exceptional accuracy.
Abstract:In the literature on projection-based nonlinear model order reduction for fluid dynamics problems, it is often claimed that due to modal truncation, a projection-based reduced-order model (PROM) does not resolve the dissipative regime of the turbulent energy cascade and therefore is numerically unstable. Efforts at addressing this claim have ranged from attempting to model the effects of the truncated modes to enriching the classical subspace of approximation in order to account for the truncated phenomena. This paper challenges this claim. Exploring the relationship between projection-based model order reduction and semi-discretization and using numerical evidence from three relevant flow problems, it argues in an orderly manner that the real culprit behind most if not all reported numerical instabilities of PROMs for turbulence and convection-dominated turbulent flow problems is the Galerkin framework that has been used for constructing the PROMs. The paper also shows that alternatively, a Petrov-Galerkin framework can be used to construct numerically stable PROMs for convection-dominated laminar as well as turbulent flow problems that are numerically stable and accurate, without resorting to additional closure models or tailoring of the subspace of approximation. It also shows that such alternative PROMs deliver significant speedup factors.