Improving Cross-Domain Low-Resource Text Generation through LLM Post-Editing: A Programmer-Interpreter Approach

Post-editing has proven effective in improving the quality of text generated by large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 or GPT-4, particularly when direct updating of their parameters to enhance text quality is infeasible or expensive. However, relying solely on smaller language models for post-editing can limit the LLMs' ability to generalize across domains. Moreover, the editing strategies in these methods are not optimally designed for text-generation tasks. To address these limitations, we propose a neural programmer-interpreter approach that preserves the domain generalization ability of LLMs when editing their output. The editing actions in this framework are specifically devised for text generation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the programmer-interpreter significantly enhances GPT-3.5's performance in logical form-to-text conversion and low-resource machine translation, surpassing other state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLM post-editing methods in cross-domain settings.

Reranking for Natural Language Generation from Logical Forms: A Study based on Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language generation. However, their output quality can be inconsistent, posing challenges for generating natural language from logical forms (LFs). This task requires the generated outputs to embody the exact semantics of LFs, without missing any LF semantics or creating any hallucinations. In this work, we tackle this issue by proposing a novel generate-and-rerank approach. Our approach involves initially generating a set of candidate outputs by prompting an LLM and subsequently reranking them using a task-specific reranker model. In addition, we curate a manually collected dataset to evaluate the alignment between different ranking metrics and human judgements. The chosen ranking metrics are utilized to enhance the training and evaluation of the reranker model. By conducting extensive experiments on three diverse datasets, we demonstrate that the candidates selected by our reranker outperform those selected by baseline methods in terms of semantic consistency and fluency, as measured by three comprehensive metrics. Our findings provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of our approach in improving the quality of generated outputs.