Can a Single Tree Outperform an Entire Forest?

The prevailing mindset is that a single decision tree underperforms classic random forests in testing accuracy, despite its advantages in interpretability and lightweight structure. This study challenges such a mindset by significantly improving the testing accuracy of an oblique regression tree through our gradient-based entire tree optimization framework, making its performance comparable to the classic random forest. Our approach reformulates tree training as a differentiable unconstrained optimization task, employing a scaled sigmoid approximation strategy. To ameliorate numerical instability, we propose an algorithmic scheme that solves a sequence of increasingly accurate approximations. Additionally, a subtree polish strategy is implemented to reduce approximation errors accumulated across the tree. Extensive experiments on 16 datasets demonstrate that our optimized tree outperforms the classic random forest by an average of $2.03\%$ improvements in testing accuracy.

A GPU-Accelerated Moving-Horizon Algorithm for Training Deep Classification Trees on Large Datasets

Decision trees are essential yet NP-complete to train, prompting the widespread use of heuristic methods such as CART, which suffers from sub-optimal performance due to its greedy nature. Recently, breakthroughs in finding optimal decision trees have emerged; however, these methods still face significant computational costs and struggle with continuous features in large-scale datasets and deep trees. To address these limitations, we introduce a moving-horizon differential evolution algorithm for classification trees with continuous features (MH-DEOCT). Our approach consists of a discrete tree decoding method that eliminates duplicated searches between adjacent samples, a GPU-accelerated implementation that significantly reduces running time, and a moving-horizon strategy that iteratively trains shallow subtrees at each node to balance the vision and optimizer capability. Comprehensive studies on 68 UCI datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms the heuristic method CART on training and testing accuracy by an average of 3.44% and 1.71%, respectively. Moreover, these numerical studies empirically demonstrate that MH-DEOCT achieves near-optimal performance (only 0.38% and 0.06% worse than the global optimal method on training and testing, respectively), while it offers remarkable scalability for deep trees (e.g., depth=8) and large-scale datasets (e.g., ten million samples).