Abstract:Reinforcement Learning (RL) has increasingly become a preferred method over traditional rule-based systems in diverse human-in-the-loop (HITL) applications due to its adaptability to the dynamic nature of human interactions. However, integrating RL in such settings raises significant privacy concerns, as it might inadvertently expose sensitive user information. Addressing this, our paper focuses on developing PAPER-HILT, an innovative, adaptive RL strategy through exploiting an early-exit approach designed explicitly for privacy preservation in HITL environments. This approach dynamically adjusts the tradeoff between privacy protection and system utility, tailoring its operation to individual behavioral patterns and preferences. We mainly highlight the challenge of dealing with the variable and evolving nature of human behavior, which renders static privacy models ineffective. PAPER-HILT's effectiveness is evaluated through its application in two distinct contexts: Smart Home environments and Virtual Reality (VR) Smart Classrooms. The empirical results demonstrate PAPER-HILT's capability to provide a personalized equilibrium between user privacy and application utility, adapting effectively to individual user needs and preferences. On average for both experiments, utility (performance) drops by 24%, and privacy (state prediction) improves by 31%.
Abstract:Achieving fairness in sequential-decision making systems within Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) environments is a critical concern, especially when multiple humans with different behavior and expectations are affected by the same adaptation decisions in the system. This human variability factor adds more complexity since policies deemed fair at one point in time may become discriminatory over time due to variations in human preferences resulting from inter- and intra-human variability. This paper addresses the fairness problem from an equity lens, considering human behavior variability, and the changes in human preferences over time. We propose FAIRO, a novel algorithm for fairness-aware sequential-decision making in HITL adaptation, which incorporates these notions into the decision-making process. In particular, FAIRO decomposes this complex fairness task into adaptive sub-tasks based on individual human preferences through leveraging the Options reinforcement learning framework. We design FAIRO to generalize to three types of HITL application setups that have the shared adaptation decision problem. Furthermore, we recognize that fairness-aware policies can sometimes conflict with the application's utility. To address this challenge, we provide a fairness-utility tradeoff in FAIRO, allowing system designers to balance the objectives of fairness and utility based on specific application requirements. Extensive evaluations of FAIRO on the three HITL applications demonstrate its generalizability and effectiveness in promoting fairness while accounting for human variability. On average, FAIRO can improve fairness compared with other methods across all three applications by 35.36%.
Abstract:Thanks to the rapid growth in wearable technologies and recent advancement in machine learning and signal processing, monitoring complex human contexts becomes feasible, paving the way to develop human-in-the-loop IoT systems that naturally evolve to adapt to the human and environment state autonomously. Nevertheless, a central challenge in designing many of these IoT systems arises from the requirement to infer the human mental state, such as intention, stress, cognition load, or learning ability. While different human contexts can be inferred from the fusion of different sensor modalities that can correlate to a particular mental state, the human brain provides a richer sensor modality that gives us more insights into the required human context. This paper proposes ERUDITE, a human-in-the-loop IoT system for the learning environment that exploits recent wearable neurotechnology to decode brain signals. Through insights from concept learning theory, ERUDITE can infer the human state of learning and understand when human learning increases or declines. By quantifying human learning as an input sensory signal, ERUDITE can provide adequate personalized feedback to humans in a learning environment to enhance their learning experience. ERUDITE is evaluated across $15$ participants and showed that by using the brain signals as a sensor modality to infer the human learning state and providing personalized adaptation to the learning environment, the participants' learning performance increased on average by $26\%$. Furthermore, we showed that ERUDITE can be deployed on an edge-based prototype to evaluate its practicality and scalability.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) presents numerous benefits compared to rule-based approaches in various applications. Privacy concerns have grown with the widespread use of RL trained with privacy-sensitive data in IoT devices, especially for human-in-the-loop systems. On the one hand, RL methods enhance the user experience by trying to adapt to the highly dynamic nature of humans. On the other hand, trained policies can leak the user's private information. Recent attention has been drawn to designing privacy-aware RL algorithms while maintaining an acceptable system utility. A central challenge in designing privacy-aware RL, especially for human-in-the-loop systems, is that humans have intrinsic variability and their preferences and behavior evolve. The effect of one privacy leak mitigation can be different for the same human or across different humans over time. Hence, we can not design one fixed model for privacy-aware RL that fits all. To that end, we propose adaPARL, an adaptive approach for privacy-aware RL, especially for human-in-the-loop IoT systems. adaPARL provides a personalized privacy-utility trade-off depending on human behavior and preference. We validate the proposed adaPARL on two IoT applications, namely (i) Human-in-the-Loop Smart Home and (ii) Human-in-the-Loop Virtual Reality (VR) Smart Classroom. Results obtained on these two applications validate the generality of adaPARL and its ability to provide a personalized privacy-utility trade-off. On average, for the first application, adaPARL improves the utility by $57\%$ over the baseline and by $43\%$ over randomization. adaPARL also reduces the privacy leak by $23\%$ on average. For the second application, adaPARL decreases the privacy leak to $44\%$ before the utility drops by $15\%$.