Abstract:Group interactions are a natural part of our daily life, and as robots become more integrated into society, they must be able to socially interact with multiple people at the same time. However, group human-robot interaction (HRI) poses unique computational challenges often overlooked in the current HRI literature. We conducted a scoping review including 44 group HRI papers from the last decade (2015-2024). From these papers, we extracted variables related to perception and behaviour generation challenges, as well as factors related to the environment, group, and robot capabilities that influence these challenges. Our findings show that key computational challenges in perception included detection of groups, engagement, and conversation information, while challenges in behaviour generation involved developing approaching and conversational behaviours. We also identified research gaps, such as improving detection of subgroups and interpersonal relationships, and recommended future work in group HRI to help researchers address these computational challenges
Abstract:Understanding and respecting personal space preferences is essential for socially assistive robots designed for older adult users. This work introduces and evaluates a novel personalized context-aware method for modeling users' proxemics preferences during human-robot interactions. Using an interactive augmented reality interface, we collected a set of user-preferred distances from the robot and employed an active transfer learning approach to fine-tune a specialized deep learning model. We evaluated this approach through two user studies: 1) a convenience population study (N = 24) to validate the efficacy of the active transfer learning approach; and 2) a user study involving older adults (N = 15) to assess the system's usability. We compared the data collected with the augmented reality interface and with the physical robot to examine the relationship between proxemics preferences for a virtual robot versus a physically embodied robot. We found that fine-tuning significantly improved model performance: on average, the error in testing decreased by 26.97% after fine-tuning. The system was well-received by older adult participants, who provided valuable feedback and suggestions for future work.