Fisher-Guided Selective Forgetting: Mitigating The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learning

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) systems often tend to overfit to early experiences, a phenomenon known as the primacy bias (PB). This bias can severely hinder learning efficiency and final performance, particularly in complex environments. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation of PB through the lens of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). We develop a framework characterizing PB through distinct patterns in the FIM trace, identifying critical memorization and reorganization phases during learning. Building on this understanding, we propose Fisher-Guided Selective Forgetting (FGSF), a novel method that leverages the geometric structure of the parameter space to selectively modify network weights, preventing early experiences from dominating the learning process. Empirical results across DeepMind Control Suite (DMC) environments show that FGSF consistently outperforms baselines, particularly in complex tasks. We analyze the different impacts of PB on actor and critic networks, the role of replay ratios in exacerbating the effect, and the effectiveness of even simple noise injection methods. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of PB and practical mitigation strategies, offering a FIM-based geometric perspective for advancing DRL.

Upside-Down Reinforcement Learning for More Interpretable Optimal Control

Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms either learn how to map states to expected rewards or search for policies that can maximize a certain performance function. Model-Based algorithms instead, aim to learn an approximation of the underlying model of the RL environment and then use it in combination with planning algorithms. Upside-Down Reinforcement Learning (UDRL) is a novel learning paradigm that aims to learn how to predict actions from states and desired commands. This task is formulated as a Supervised Learning problem and has successfully been tackled by Neural Networks (NNs). In this paper, we investigate whether function approximation algorithms other than NNs can also be used within a UDRL framework. Our experiments, performed over several popular optimal control benchmarks, show that tree-based methods like Random Forests and Extremely Randomized Trees can perform just as well as NNs with the significant benefit of resulting in policies that are inherently more interpretable than NNs, therefore paving the way for more transparent, safe, and robust RL.