The Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Baseline: Discussing SVMs in Legal Text Classification

We aim to highlight an interesting trend to contribute to the ongoing debate around advances within legal Natural Language Processing. Recently, the focus for most legal text classification tasks has shifted towards large pre-trained deep learning models such as BERT. In this paper, we show that a more traditional approach based on Support Vector Machine classifiers reaches competitive performance with deep learning models. We also highlight that error reduction obtained by using specialised BERT-based models over baselines is noticeably smaller in the legal domain when compared to general language tasks. We discuss some hypotheses for these results to support future discussions.

LegaLMFiT: Efficient Short Legal Text Classification with LSTM Language Model Pre-Training

Large Transformer-based language models such as BERT have led to broad performance improvements on many NLP tasks. Domain-specific variants of these models have demonstrated excellent performance on a variety of specialised tasks. In legal NLP, BERT-based models have led to new state-of-the-art results on multiple tasks. The exploration of these models has demonstrated the importance of capturing the specificity of the legal language and its vocabulary. However, such approaches suffer from high computational costs, leading to a higher ecological impact and lower accessibility. Our findings, focusing on English language legal text, show that lightweight LSTM-based Language Models are able to capture enough information from a small legal text pretraining corpus and achieve excellent performance on short legal text classification tasks. This is achieved with a significantly reduced computational overhead compared to BERT-based models. However, our method also shows degraded performance on a more complex task, multi-label classification of longer documents, highlighting the limitations of this lightweight approach.