Abstract:This paper introduces VisualQuest, a novel image dataset designed to assess the ability of large language models (LLMs) to interpret non-traditional, stylized imagery. Unlike conventional photographic benchmarks, VisualQuest challenges models with images that incorporate abstract, symbolic, and metaphorical elements, requiring the integration of domain-specific knowledge and advanced reasoning. The dataset was meticulously curated through multiple stages of filtering, annotation, and standardization to ensure high quality and diversity. Our evaluations using several state-of-the-art multimodal LLMs reveal significant performance variations that underscore the importance of both factual background knowledge and inferential capabilities in visual recognition tasks. VisualQuest thus provides a robust and comprehensive benchmark for advancing research in multimodal reasoning and model architecture design.
Abstract:LLMs are widely used for offensive language detection due to their advanced capability. However, the challenges posed by human annotation disagreement in real-world datasets remain underexplored. These disagreement samples are difficult to detect due to their ambiguous nature. Additionally, the confidence of LLMs in processing disagreement samples can provide valuable insights into their alignment with human annotators. To address this gap, we systematically evaluate the ability of LLMs to detect offensive language with annotation disagreement. We compare the binary accuracy of multiple LLMs across varying annotation agreement levels and analyze the relationship between LLM confidence and annotation agreement. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of disagreement samples on LLM decision-making during few-shot learning and instruction fine-tuning. Our findings highlight the challenges posed by disagreement samples and offer guidance for improving LLM-based offensive language detection.