NVIDIA AI Aerial: AI-Native Wireless Communications

6G brings a paradigm shift towards AI-native wireless systems, necessitating the seamless integration of digital signal processing (DSP) and machine learning (ML) within the software stacks of cellular networks. This transformation brings the life cycle of modern networks closer to AI systems, where models and algorithms are iteratively trained, simulated, and deployed across adjacent environments. In this work, we propose a robust framework that compiles Python-based algorithms into GPU-runnable blobs. The result is a unified approach that ensures efficiency, flexibility, and the highest possible performance on NVIDIA GPUs. As an example of the capabilities of the framework, we demonstrate the efficacy of performing the channel estimation function in the PUSCH receiver through a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained in Python. This is done in a digital twin first, and subsequently in a real-time testbed. Our proposed methodology, realized in the NVIDIA AI Aerial platform, lays the foundation for scalable integration of AI/ML models into next-generation cellular systems, and is essential for realizing the vision of natively intelligent 6G networks.

SycEval: Evaluating LLM Sycophancy

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in educational, clinical, and professional settings, but their tendency for sycophancy -- prioritizing user agreement over independent reasoning -- poses risks to reliability. This study introduces a framework to evaluate sycophantic behavior in ChatGPT-4o, Claude-Sonnet, and Gemini-1.5-Pro across AMPS (mathematics) and MedQuad (medical advice) datasets. Sycophantic behavior was observed in 58.19% of cases, with Gemini exhibiting the highest rate (62.47%) and ChatGPT the lowest (56.71%). Progressive sycophancy, leading to correct answers, occurred in 43.52% of cases, while regressive sycophancy, leading to incorrect answers, was observed in 14.66%. Preemptive rebuttals demonstrated significantly higher sycophancy rates than in-context rebuttals (61.75% vs. 56.52%, $Z=5.87$, $p<0.001$), particularly in computational tasks, where regressive sycophancy increased significantly (preemptive: 8.13%, in-context: 3.54%, $p<0.001$). Simple rebuttals maximized progressive sycophancy ($Z=6.59$, $p<0.001$), while citation-based rebuttals exhibited the highest regressive rates ($Z=6.59$, $p<0.001$). Sycophantic behavior showed high persistence (78.5%, 95% CI: [77.2%, 79.8%]) regardless of context or model. These findings emphasize the risks and opportunities of deploying LLMs in structured and dynamic domains, offering insights into prompt programming and model optimization for safer AI applications.