Conformal Prediction for Dose-Response Models with Continuous Treatments

Understanding the dose-response relation between a continuous treatment and the outcome for an individual can greatly drive decision-making, particularly in areas like personalized drug dosing and personalized healthcare interventions. Point estimates are often insufficient in these high-risk environments, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification to support informed decisions. Conformal prediction, a distribution-free and model-agnostic method for uncertainty quantification, has seen limited application in continuous treatments or dose-response models. To address this gap, we propose a novel methodology that frames the causal dose-response problem as a covariate shift, leveraging weighted conformal prediction. By incorporating propensity estimation, conformal predictive systems, and likelihood ratios, we present a practical solution for generating prediction intervals for dose-response models. Additionally, our method approximates local coverage for every treatment value by applying kernel functions as weights in weighted conformal prediction. Finally, we use a new synthetic benchmark dataset to demonstrate the significance of covariate shift assumptions in achieving robust prediction intervals for dose-response models.

Conformal Predictive Systems Under Covariate Shift

Conformal Predictive Systems (CPS) offer a versatile framework for constructing predictive distributions, allowing for calibrated inference and informative decision-making. However, their applicability has been limited to scenarios adhering to the Independent and Identically Distributed (IID) model assumption. This paper extends CPS to accommodate scenarios characterized by covariate shifts. We therefore propose Weighted CPS (WCPS), akin to Weighted Conformal Prediction (WCP), leveraging likelihood ratios between training and testing covariate distributions. This extension enables the construction of nonparametric predictive distributions capable of handling covariate shifts. We present theoretical underpinnings and conjectures regarding the validity and efficacy of WCPS and demonstrate its utility through empirical evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Our simulation experiments indicate that WCPS are probabilistically calibrated under covariate shift.

Conformal Monte Carlo Meta-learners for Predictive Inference of Individual Treatment Effects

Knowledge of the effect of interventions, called the treatment effect, is paramount for decision-making. Approaches to estimating this treatment effect, e.g. by using Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimators, often only provide a point estimate of this treatment effect, while additional uncertainty quantification is frequently desired instead. Therefore, we present a novel method, the Conformal Monte Carlo (CMC) meta-learners, leveraging conformal predictive systems, Monte Carlo sampling, and CATE meta-learners, to instead produce a predictive distribution usable in individualized decision-making. Furthermore, we show how specific assumptions on the noise distribution of the outcome heavily affect these uncertainty predictions. Nonetheless, the CMC framework shows strong experimental coverage while retaining small interval widths to provide estimates of the true individual treatment effect.