Bayesian Optimization for Non-Convex Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization Problems

Bayesian optimization is a sample-efficient method for solving expensive, black-box optimization problems. Stochastic programming concerns optimization under uncertainty where, typically, average performance is the quantity of interest. In the first stage of a two-stage problem, here-and-now decisions must be made in the face of this uncertainty, while in the second stage, wait-and-see decisions are made after the uncertainty has been resolved. Many methods in stochastic programming assume that the objective is cheap to evaluate and linear or convex. In this work, we apply Bayesian optimization to solve non-convex, two-stage stochastic programs which are expensive to evaluate. We formulate a knowledge-gradient-based acquisition function to jointly optimize the first- and second-stage variables, establish a guarantee of asymptotic consistency and provide a computationally efficient approximation. We demonstrate comparable empirical results to an alternative we formulate which alternates its focus between the two variable types, and superior empirical results over the standard, naive, two-step benchmark. We show that differences in the dimension and length scales between the variable types can lead to inefficiencies of the two-step algorithm, while the joint and alternating acquisition functions perform well in all problems tested. Experiments are conducted on both synthetic and real-world examples.

Bayesian Optimization of Multiple Objectives with Different Latencies

Multi-objective Bayesian optimization aims to find the Pareto front of optimal trade-offs between a set of expensive objectives while collecting as few samples as possible. In some cases, it is possible to evaluate the objectives separately, and a different latency or evaluation cost can be associated with each objective. This presents an opportunity to learn the Pareto front faster by evaluating the cheaper objectives more frequently. We propose a scalarization based knowledge gradient acquisition function which accounts for the different evaluation costs of the objectives. We prove consistency of the algorithm and show empirically that it significantly outperforms a benchmark algorithm which always evaluates both objectives.