GPT-4o System Card

GPT-4o is an autoregressive omni model that accepts as input any combination of text, audio, image, and video, and generates any combination of text, audio, and image outputs. It's trained end-to-end across text, vision, and audio, meaning all inputs and outputs are processed by the same neural network. GPT-4o can respond to audio inputs in as little as 232 milliseconds, with an average of 320 milliseconds, which is similar to human response time in conversation. It matches GPT-4 Turbo performance on text in English and code, with significant improvement on text in non-English languages, while also being much faster and 50\% cheaper in the API. GPT-4o is especially better at vision and audio understanding compared to existing models. In line with our commitment to building AI safely and consistent with our voluntary commitments to the White House, we are sharing the GPT-4o System Card, which includes our Preparedness Framework evaluations. In this System Card, we provide a detailed look at GPT-4o's capabilities, limitations, and safety evaluations across multiple categories, focusing on speech-to-speech while also evaluating text and image capabilities, and measures we've implemented to ensure the model is safe and aligned. We also include third-party assessments on dangerous capabilities, as well as discussion of potential societal impacts of GPT-4o's text and vision capabilities.

Capacity Analysis of Vector Symbolic Architectures

Hyperdimensional computing (HDC) is a biologically-inspired framework that uses high-dimensional vectors and various vector operations to represent and manipulate symbols. The ensemble of a particular vector space and two vector operations (one addition-like for "bundling" and one outer-product-like for "binding") form what is called a "vector symbolic architecture" (VSA). While VSAs have been employed in numerous applications and studied empirically, many theoretical questions about VSAs remain open. We provide theoretical analyses for the *representation capacities* of three popular VSAs: MAP-I, MAP-B, and Binary Sparse. Representation capacity here refers to upper bounds on the dimensions of the VSA vectors required to perform certain symbolic tasks (such as testing for set membership $i \in S$ and estimating set intersection sizes $|S \cap T|$) to a given degree of accuracy. We also describe a relationship between the MAP-I VSA to Hopfield networks, which are simple models of associative memory, and analyze the ability of Hopfield networks to perform some of the same tasks that are typically asked of VSAs. Our analysis of MAP-I casts the VSA vectors as the outputs of *sketching* (dimensionality reduction) algorithms such as the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform; this provides a clean, simple framework for obtaining bounds on MAP-I's representation capacity. We also provide, to our knowledge, the first analysis of testing set membership in a bundle of general pairwise bindings from MAP-I. Binary sparse VSAs are well-known to be related to Bloom filters; we give analyses of set intersection for Bloom and Counting Bloom filters. Our analysis of MAP-B and Binary Sparse bundling include new applications of several concentration inequalities.