Abstract:The massive use of digital documents due to the substantial trend of paperless initiatives confronted some companies to find ways to process thousands of documents per day automatically. To achieve this, they use automatic information retrieval (IR) allowing them to extract useful information from large datasets quickly. In order to have effective IR methods, it is first necessary to have an adequate dataset. Although companies have enough data to take into account their needs, there is also a need for a public database to compare contributions between state-of-the-art methods. Public data on the document exists as DocVQA[2] and XFUND [10], but these do not fully satisfy the needs of companies. XFUND contains only form documents while the company uses several types of documents (i.e. structured documents like forms but also semi-structured as invoices, and unstructured as emails). Compared to XFUND, DocVQA has several types of documents but only 4.5% of them are corporate documents (i.e. invoice, purchase order, etc). All of this 4.5% of documents do not meet the diversity of documents required by the company. We propose CHIC a visual question-answering public dataset. This dataset contains different types of corporate documents and the information extracted from these documents meet the right expectations of companies.
Abstract:One major drawback of state of the art Neural Networks (NN)-based approaches for document classification purposes is the large number of training samples required to obtain an efficient classification. The minimum required number is around one thousand annotated documents for each class. In many cases it is very difficult, if not impossible, to gather this number of samples in real industrial processes. In this paper, we analyse the efficiency of NN-based document classification systems in a sub-optimal training case, based on the situation of a company document stream. We evaluated three different approaches, one based on image content and two on textual content. The evaluation was divided into four parts: a reference case, to assess the performance of the system in the lab; two cases that each simulate a specific difficulty linked to document stream processing; and a realistic case that combined all of these difficulties. The realistic case highlighted the fact that there is a significant drop in the efficiency of NN-Based document classification systems. Although they remain efficient for well represented classes (with an over-fitting of the system for those classes), it is impossible for them to handle appropriately less well represented classes. NN-Based document classification systems need to be adapted to resolve these two problems before they can be considered for use in a company document stream.