Generator-based Graph Generation via Heat Diffusion

Graph generative modelling has become an essential task due to the wide range of applications in chemistry, biology, social networks, and knowledge representation. In this work, we propose a novel framework for generating graphs by adapting the Generator Matching (arXiv:2410.20587) paradigm to graph-structured data. We leverage the graph Laplacian and its associated heat kernel to define a continous-time diffusion on each graph. The Laplacian serves as the infinitesimal generator of this diffusion, and its heat kernel provides a family of conditional perturbations of the initial graph. A neural network is trained to match this generator by minimising a Bregman divergence between the true generator and a learnable surrogate. Once trained, the surrogate generator is used to simulate a time-reversed diffusion process to sample new graph structures. Our framework unifies and generalises existing diffusion-based graph generative models, injecting domain-specific inductive bias via the Laplacian, while retaining the flexibility of neural approximators. Experimental studies demonstrate that our approach captures structural properties of real and synthetic graphs effectively.

Further Understanding of a Local Gaussian Process Approximation: Characterising Convergence in the Finite Regime

We show that common choices of kernel functions for a highly accurate and massively scalable nearest-neighbour based GP regression model (GPnn: \cite{GPnn}) exhibit gradual convergence to asymptotic behaviour as dataset-size $n$ increases. For isotropic kernels such as Mat\'{e}rn and squared-exponential, an upper bound on the predictive MSE can be obtained as $O(n^{-\frac{p}{d}})$ for input dimension $d$, $p$ dictated by the kernel (and $d>p$) and fixed number of nearest-neighbours $m$ with minimal assumptions on the input distribution. Similar bounds can be found under model misspecification and combined to give overall rates of convergence of both MSE and an important calibration metric. We show that lower bounds on $n$ can be given in terms of $m$, $l$, $p$, $d$, a tolerance $\varepsilon$ and a probability $\delta$. When $m$ is chosen to be $O(n^{\frac{p}{p+d}})$ minimax optimal rates of convergence are attained. Finally, we demonstrate empirical performance and show that in many cases convergence occurs faster than the upper bounds given here.

Leveraging Locality and Robustness to Achieve Massively Scalable Gaussian Process Regression

The accurate predictions and principled uncertainty measures provided by GP regression incur O(n^3) cost which is prohibitive for modern-day large-scale applications. This has motivated extensive work on computationally efficient approximations. We introduce a new perspective by exploring robustness properties and limiting behaviour of GP nearest-neighbour (GPnn) prediction. We demonstrate through theory and simulation that as the data-size n increases, accuracy of estimated parameters and GP model assumptions become increasingly irrelevant to GPnn predictive accuracy. Consequently, it is sufficient to spend small amounts of work on parameter estimation in order to achieve high MSE accuracy, even in the presence of gross misspecification. In contrast, as n tends to infinity, uncertainty calibration and NLL are shown to remain sensitive to just one parameter, the additive noise-variance; but we show that this source of inaccuracy can be corrected for, thereby achieving both well-calibrated uncertainty measures and accurate predictions at remarkably low computational cost. We exhibit a very simple GPnn regression algorithm with stand-out performance compared to other state-of-the-art GP approximations as measured on large UCI datasets. It operates at a small fraction of those other methods' training costs, for example on a basic laptop taking about 30 seconds to train on a dataset of size n = 1.6 x 10^6.

Provably Reliable Large-Scale Sampling from Gaussian Processes

When comparing approximate Gaussian process (GP) models, it can be helpful to be able to generate data from any GP. If we are interested in how approximate methods perform at scale, we may wish to generate very large synthetic datasets to evaluate them. Na\"{i}vely doing so would cost \(\mathcal{O}(n^3)\) flops and \(\mathcal{O}(n^2)\) memory to generate a size \(n\) sample. We demonstrate how to scale such data generation to large \(n\) whilst still providing guarantees that, with high probability, the sample is indistinguishable from a sample from the desired GP.