Data Similarity-Based One-Shot Clustering for Multi-Task Hierarchical Federated Learning

We address the problem of cluster identity estimation in a hierarchical federated learning setting in which users work toward learning different tasks. To overcome the challenge of task heterogeneity, users need to be grouped in a way such that users with the same task are in the same group, conducting training together, while sharing the weights of feature extraction layers with the other groups. Toward that end, we propose a one-shot clustering algorithm that can effectively identify and group users based on their data similarity. This enables more efficient collaboration and sharing of a common layer representation within the federated learning system. Our proposed algorithm not only enhances the clustering process, but also overcomes challenges related to privacy concerns, communication overhead, and the need for prior knowledge about learning models or loss function behaviors. We validate our proposed algorithm using various datasets such as CIFAR-10 and Fashion MNIST, and show that it outperforms the baseline in terms of accuracy and variance reduction.

Delay Sensitive Hierarchical Federated Learning with Stochastic Local Updates

The impact of local averaging on the performance of federated learning (FL) systems is studied in the presence of communication delay between the clients and the parameter server. To minimize the effect of delay, clients are assigned into different groups, each having its own local parameter server (LPS) that aggregates its clients' models. The groups' models are then aggregated at a global parameter server (GPS) that only communicates with the LPSs. Such setting is known as hierarchical FL (HFL). Different from most works in the literature, the number of local and global communication rounds in our work is randomly determined by the (different) delays experienced by each group of clients. Specifically, the number of local averaging rounds are tied to a wall-clock time period coined the sync time $S$, after which the LPSs synchronize their models by sharing them with the GPS. Such sync time $S$ is then reapplied until a global wall-clock time is exhausted.