On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models

The widespread availability of multimodal generative models has sparked critical discussions on their fairness, reliability, and potential for misuse. While text-to-image models can produce high-fidelity, user-guided images, they also exhibit unpredictable behavior and vulnerabilities, which can be exploited to manipulate class or concept representations. To address this, we propose an evaluation framework designed to assess model reliability through their responses to globally- and locally-applied `semantic' perturbations in the embedding space, pinpointing inputs that trigger unreliable behavior. Our approach offers deeper insights into two essential aspects: (i) generative diversity, evaluating the breadth of visual representations for learned concepts, and (ii) generative fairness, examining how removing concepts from input prompts affects semantic guidance. Beyond these evaluations, our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and retrieval of bias provenance. We will release our code. Keywords: Fairness, Reliability, AI Ethics, Bias, Text-to-Image Models