Semiparametric KSD test: unifying score and distance-based approaches for goodness-of-fit testing

Goodness-of-fit (GoF) tests are fundamental for assessing model adequacy. Score-based tests are appealing because they require fitting the model only once under the null. However, extending them to powerful nonparametric alternatives is difficult due to the lack of suitable score functions. Through a class of exponentially tilted models, we show that the resulting score-based GoF tests are equivalent to the tests based on integral probability metrics (IPMs) indexed by a function class. When the class is rich, the test is universally consistent. This simple yet insightful perspective enables reinterpretation of classical distance-based testing procedures-including those based on Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance, Wasserstein-1 distance, and maximum mean discrepancy-as arising from score-based constructions. Building on this insight, we propose a new nonparametric score-based GoF test through a special class of IPM induced by kernelized Stein's function class, called semiparametric kernelized Stein discrepancy (SKSD) test. Compared with other nonparametric score-based tests, the SKSD test is computationally efficient and accommodates general nuisance-parameter estimators, supported by a generic parametric bootstrap procedure. The SKSD test is universally consistent and attains Pitman efficiency. Moreover, SKSD test provides simple GoF tests for models with intractable likelihoods but tractable scores with the help of Stein's identity and we use two popular models, kernel exponential family and conditional Gaussian models, to illustrate the power of our method. Our method achieves power comparable to task-specific normality tests such as Anderson-Darling and Lilliefors, despite being designed for general nonparametric alternatives.

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models are optimally adaptive to unknown low dimensionality

The denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) has emerged as a mainstream generative model in generative AI. While sharp convergence guarantees have been established for the DDPM, the iteration complexity is, in general, proportional to the ambient data dimension, resulting in overly conservative theory that fails to explain its practical efficiency. This has motivated the recent work Li and Yan (2024a) to investigate how the DDPM can achieve sampling speed-ups through automatic exploitation of intrinsic low dimensionality of data. We strengthen this prior work by demonstrating, in some sense, optimal adaptivity to unknown low dimensionality. For a broad class of data distributions with intrinsic dimension $k$, we prove that the iteration complexity of the DDPM scales nearly linearly with $k$, which is optimal when using KL divergence to measure distributional discrepancy. Our theory is established based on a key observation: the DDPM update rule is equivalent to running a suitably parameterized SDE upon discretization, where the nonlinear component of the drift term is intrinsically low-dimensional.

Towards a mathematical theory for consistency training in diffusion models

Consistency models, which were proposed to mitigate the high computational overhead during the sampling phase of diffusion models, facilitate single-step sampling while attaining state-of-the-art empirical performance. When integrated into the training phase, consistency models attempt to train a sequence of consistency functions capable of mapping any point at any time step of the diffusion process to its starting point. Despite the empirical success, a comprehensive theoretical understanding of consistency training remains elusive. This paper takes a first step towards establishing theoretical underpinnings for consistency models. We demonstrate that, in order to generate samples within $\varepsilon$ proximity to the target in distribution (measured by some Wasserstein metric), it suffices for the number of steps in consistency learning to exceed the order of $d^{5/2}/\varepsilon$, with $d$ the data dimension. Our theory offers rigorous insights into the validity and efficacy of consistency models, illuminating their utility in downstream inference tasks.