On the Optimality of Single-label and Multi-label Neural Network Decoders

We investigate the design of two neural network (NN) architectures recently proposed as decoders for forward error correction: the so-called single-label NN (SLNN) and multi-label NN (MLNN) decoders. These decoders have been reported to achieve near-optimal codeword- and bit-wise performance, respectively. Results in the literature show near-optimality for a variety of short codes. In this paper, we analytically prove that certain SLNN and MLNN architectures can, in fact, always realize optimal decoding, regardless of the code. These optimal architectures and their binary weights are shown to be defined by the codebook, i.e., no training or network optimization is required. Our proposed architectures are in fact not NNs, but a different way of implementing the maximum likelihood decoding rule. Optimal performance is numerically demonstrated for Hamming $(7,4)$, Polar $(16,8)$, and BCH $(31,21)$ codes. The results show that our optimal architectures are less complex than the SLNN and MLNN architectures proposed in the literature, which in fact only achieve near-optimal performance. Extension to longer codes is still hindered by the curse of dimensionality. Therefore, even though SLNN and MLNN can perform maximum likelihood decoding, such architectures cannot be used for medium and long codes.

On the Design and Performance of Machine Learning Based Error Correcting Decoders

This paper analyzes the design and competitiveness of four neural network (NN) architectures recently proposed as decoders for forward error correction (FEC) codes. We first consider the so-called single-label neural network (SLNN) and the multi-label neural network (MLNN) decoders which have been reported to achieve near maximum likelihood (ML) performance. Here, we show analytically that SLNN and MLNN decoders can always achieve ML performance, regardless of the code dimensions -- although at the cost of computational complexity -- and no training is in fact required. We then turn our attention to two transformer-based decoders: the error correction code transformer (ECCT) and the cross-attention message passing transformer (CrossMPT). We compare their performance against traditional decoders, and show that ordered statistics decoding outperforms these transformer-based decoders. The results in this paper cast serious doubts on the application of NN-based FEC decoders in the short and medium block length regime.