On the Relationship Between Robustness and Expressivity of Graph Neural Networks

We investigate the vulnerability of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to bit-flip attacks (BFAs) by introducing an analytical framework to study the influence of architectural features, graph properties, and their interaction. The expressivity of GNNs refers to their ability to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs and depends on the encoding of node neighborhoods. We examine the vulnerability of neural multiset functions commonly used for this purpose and establish formal criteria to characterize a GNN's susceptibility to losing expressivity due to BFAs. This enables an analysis of the impact of homophily, graph structural variety, feature encoding, and activation functions on GNN robustness. We derive theoretical bounds for the number of bit flips required to degrade GNN expressivity on a dataset, identifying ReLU-activated GNNs operating on highly homophilous graphs with low-dimensional or one-hot encoded features as particularly susceptible. Empirical results using ten real-world datasets confirm the statistical significance of our key theoretical insights and offer actionable results to mitigate BFA risks in expressivity-critical applications.

Attacking Graph Neural Networks with Bit Flips: Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Indifferent

Prior attacks on graph neural networks have mostly focused on graph poisoning and evasion, neglecting the network's weights and biases. Traditional weight-based fault injection attacks, such as bit flip attacks used for convolutional neural networks, do not consider the unique properties of graph neural networks. We propose the Injectivity Bit Flip Attack, the first bit flip attack designed specifically for graph neural networks. Our attack targets the learnable neighborhood aggregation functions in quantized message passing neural networks, degrading their ability to distinguish graph structures and losing the expressivity of the Weisfeiler-Lehman test. Our findings suggest that exploiting mathematical properties specific to certain graph neural network architectures can significantly increase their vulnerability to bit flip attacks. Injectivity Bit Flip Attacks can degrade the maximal expressive Graph Isomorphism Networks trained on various graph property prediction datasets to random output by flipping only a small fraction of the network's bits, demonstrating its higher destructive power compared to a bit flip attack transferred from convolutional neural networks. Our attack is transparent and motivated by theoretical insights which are confirmed by extensive empirical results.

Non-Redundant Graph Neural Networks with Improved Expressiveness

Message passing graph neural networks iteratively compute node embeddings by aggregating messages from all neighbors. This procedure can be viewed as a neural variant of the Weisfeiler-Leman method, which limits their expressive power. Moreover, oversmoothing and oversquashing restrict the number of layers these networks can effectively utilize. The repeated exchange and encoding of identical information in message passing amplifies oversquashing. We propose a novel aggregation scheme based on neighborhood trees, which allows for controlling the redundancy by pruning branches of the unfolding trees underlying standard message passing. We prove that reducing redundancy improves expressivity and experimentally show that it alleviates oversquashing. We investigate the interaction between redundancy in message passing and redundancy in computation and propose a compact representation of neighborhood trees, from which we compute node and graph embeddings via a neural tree canonization technique. Our method is provably more expressive than the Weisfeiler-Leman method, less susceptible to oversquashing than message passing neural networks, and provides high classification accuracy on widely-used benchmark datasets.