Gaussian Process Surrogate Models for Efficient Estimation of Structural Response Distributions and Order Statistics

Engineering disciplines often rely on extensive simulations to ensure that structures are designed to withstand harsh conditions while avoiding over-engineering for unlikely scenarios. Assessments such as Serviceability Limit State (SLS) involve evaluating weather events, including estimating loads not expected to be exceeded more than a specified number of times (e.g., 100) throughout the structure's design lifetime. Although physics-based simulations provide robust and detailed insights, they are computationally expensive, making it challenging to generate statistically valid representations of a wide range of weather conditions. To address these challenges, we propose an approach using Gaussian Process (GP) surrogate models trained on a limited set of simulation outputs to directly generate the structural response distribution. We apply this method to an SLS assessment for estimating the order statistics \(Y_{100}\), representing the 100th highest response, of a structure exposed to 25 years of historical weather observations. Our results indicate that the GP surrogate models provide comparable results to full simulations but at a fraction of the computational cost.

Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness in Machine Learning Applications

Distribution shifts, where statistical properties differ between training and test datasets, present a significant challenge in real-world machine learning applications where they directly impact model generalization and robustness. In this study, we explore model adaptation and generalization by utilizing synthetic data to systematically address distributional disparities. Our investigation aims to identify the prerequisites for successful model adaptation across diverse data distributions, while quantifying the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we generate synthetic data using the Van der Waals equation for gases and employ quantitative measures such as Kullback-Leibler divergence, Jensen-Shannon distance, and Mahalanobis distance to assess data similarity. These metrics en able us to evaluate both model accuracy and quantify the associated uncertainty in predictions arising from data distribution shifts. Our findings suggest that utilizing statistical measures, such as the Mahalanobis distance, to determine whether model predictions fall within the low-error "interpolation regime" or the high-error "extrapolation regime" provides a complementary method for assessing distribution shift and model uncertainty. These insights hold significant value for enhancing model robustness and generalization, essential for the successful deployment of machine learning applications in real-world scenarios.

Point Cloud Data Simulation and Modelling with Aize Workspace

This work takes a look at data models often used in digital twins and presents preliminary results specifically from surface reconstruction and semantic segmentation models trained using simulated data. This work is expected to serve as a ground work for future endeavours in data contextualisation inside a digital twin.