Privacy-Preserving Taxi-Demand Prediction Using Federated Learning

Taxi-demand prediction is an important application of machine learning that enables taxi-providing facilities to optimize their operations and city planners to improve transportation infrastructure and services. However, the use of sensitive data in these systems raises concerns about privacy and security. In this paper, we propose the use of federated learning for taxi-demand prediction that allows multiple parties to train a machine learning model on their own data while keeping the data private and secure. This can enable organizations to build models on data they otherwise would not be able to access. Evaluation with real-world data collected from 16 taxi service providers in Japan over a period of six months showed that the proposed system can predict the demand level accurately within 1\% error compared to a single model trained with integrated data.

Membership Inference Attacks against Diffusion Models

Diffusion models have attracted attention in recent years as innovative generative models. In this paper, we investigate whether a diffusion model is resistant to a membership inference attack, which evaluates the privacy leakage of a machine learning model. We primarily discuss the diffusion model from the standpoints of comparison with a generative adversarial network (GAN) as conventional models and hyperparameters unique to the diffusion model, i.e., time steps, sampling steps, and sampling variances. We conduct extensive experiments with DDIM as a diffusion model and DCGAN as a GAN on the CelebA and CIFAR-10 datasets in both white-box and black-box settings and then confirm if the diffusion model is comparably resistant to a membership inference attack as GAN. Next, we demonstrate that the impact of time steps is significant and intermediate steps in a noise schedule are the most vulnerable to the attack. We also found two key insights through further analysis. First, we identify that DDIM is vulnerable to the attack for small sample sizes instead of achieving a lower FID. Second, sampling steps in hyperparameters are important for resistance to the attack, whereas the impact of sampling variances is quite limited.