Skin Cancer Images Classification using Transfer Learning Techniques

Skin cancer is one of the most common and deadliest types of cancer. Early diagnosis of skin cancer at a benign stage is critical to reducing cancer mortality. To detect skin cancer at an earlier stage an automated system is compulsory that can save the life of many patients. Many previous studies have addressed the problem of skin cancer diagnosis using various deep learning and transfer learning models. However, existing literature has limitations in its accuracy and time-consuming procedure. In this work, we applied five different pre-trained transfer learning approaches for binary classification of skin cancer detection at benign and malignant stages. To increase the accuracy of these models we fine-tune different layers and activation functions. We used a publicly available ISIC dataset to evaluate transfer learning approaches. For model stability, data augmentation techniques are applied to improve the randomness of the input dataset. These approaches are evaluated using different hyperparameters such as batch sizes, epochs, and optimizers. The experimental results show that the ResNet-50 model provides an accuracy of 0.935, F1-score of 0.86, and precision of 0.94.

FedFair^3: Unlocking Threefold Fairness in Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging paradigm in machine learning without exposing clients' raw data. In practical scenarios with numerous clients, encouraging fair and efficient client participation in federated learning is of utmost importance, which is also challenging given the heterogeneity in data distribution and device properties. Existing works have proposed different client-selection methods that consider fairness; however, they fail to select clients with high utilities while simultaneously achieving fair accuracy levels. In this paper, we propose a fair client-selection approach that unlocks threefold fairness in federated learning. In addition to having a fair client-selection strategy, we enforce an equitable number of rounds for client participation and ensure a fair accuracy distribution over the clients. The experimental results demonstrate that FedFair^3, in comparison to the state-of-the-art baselines, achieves 18.15% less accuracy variance on the IID data and 54.78% on the non-IID data, without decreasing the global accuracy. Furthermore, it shows 24.36% less wall-clock training time on average.