Interpretation of High-Dimensional Regression Coefficients by Comparison with Linearized Compressing Features

Linear regression is often deemed inherently interpretable; however, challenges arise for high-dimensional data. We focus on further understanding how linear regression approximates nonlinear responses from high-dimensional functional data, motivated by predicting cycle life for lithium-ion batteries. We develop a linearization method to derive feature coefficients, which we compare with the closest regression coefficients of the path of regression solutions. We showcase the methods on battery data case studies where a single nonlinear compressing feature, $g\colon \mathbb{R}^p \to \mathbb{R}$, is used to construct a synthetic response, $\mathbf{y} \in \mathbb{R}$. This unifying view of linear regression and compressing features for high-dimensional functional data helps to understand (1) how regression coefficients are shaped in the highly regularized domain and how they relate to linearized feature coefficients and (2) how the shape of regression coefficients changes as a function of regularization to approximate nonlinear responses by exploiting local structures.

Cycle Life Prediction for Lithium-ion Batteries: Machine Learning and More

Batteries are dynamic systems with complicated nonlinear aging, highly dependent on cell design, chemistry, manufacturing, and operational conditions. Prediction of battery cycle life and estimation of aging states is important to accelerate battery R&D, testing, and to further the understanding of how batteries degrade. Beyond testing, battery management systems rely on real-time models and onboard diagnostics and prognostics for safe operation. Estimating the state of health and remaining useful life of a battery is important to optimize performance and use resources optimally. This tutorial begins with an overview of first-principles, machine learning, and hybrid battery models. Then, a typical pipeline for the development of interpretable machine learning models is explained and showcased for cycle life prediction from laboratory testing data. We highlight the challenges of machine learning models, motivating the incorporation of physics in hybrid modeling approaches, which are needed to decipher the aging trajectory of batteries but require more data and further work on the physics of battery degradation. The tutorial closes with a discussion on generalization and further research directions.