Dynamic Memory Based Adaptive Optimization

Define an optimizer as having memory $k$ if it stores $k$ dynamically changing vectors in the parameter space. Classical SGD has memory $0$, momentum SGD optimizer has $1$ and Adam optimizer has $2$. We address the following questions: How can optimizers make use of more memory units? What information should be stored in them? How to use them for the learning steps? As an approach to the last question, we introduce a general method called "Retrospective Learning Law Correction" or shortly RLLC. This method is designed to calculate a dynamically varying linear combination (called learning law) of memory units, which themselves may evolve arbitrarily. We demonstrate RLLC on optimizers whose memory units have linear update rules and small memory ($\leq 4$ memory units). Our experiments show that in a variety of standard problems, these optimizers outperform the above mentioned three classical optimizers. We conclude that RLLC is a promising framework for boosting the performance of known optimizers by adding more memory units and by making them more adaptive.

Mode Combinability: Exploring Convex Combinations of Permutation Aligned Models

We explore element-wise convex combinations of two permutation-aligned neural network parameter vectors $\Theta_A$ and $\Theta_B$ of size $d$. We conduct extensive experiments by examining various distributions of such model combinations parametrized by elements of the hypercube $[0,1]^{d}$ and its vicinity. Our findings reveal that broad regions of the hypercube form surfaces of low loss values, indicating that the notion of linear mode connectivity extends to a more general phenomenon which we call mode combinability. We also make several novel observations regarding linear mode connectivity and model re-basin. We demonstrate a transitivity property: two models re-based to a common third model are also linear mode connected, and a robustness property: even with significant perturbations of the neuron matchings the resulting combinations continue to form a working model. Moreover, we analyze the functional and weight similarity of model combinations and show that such combinations are non-vacuous in the sense that there are significant functional differences between the resulting models.

Similarity and Matching of Neural Network Representations

We employ a toolset -- dubbed Dr. Frankenstein -- to analyse the similarity of representations in deep neural networks. With this toolset, we aim to match the activations on given layers of two trained neural networks by joining them with a stitching layer. We demonstrate that the inner representations emerging in deep convolutional neural networks with the same architecture but different initializations can be matched with a surprisingly high degree of accuracy even with a single, affine stitching layer. We choose the stitching layer from several possible classes of linear transformations and investigate their performance and properties. The task of matching representations is closely related to notions of similarity. Using this toolset, we also provide a novel viewpoint on the current line of research regarding similarity indices of neural network representations: the perspective of the performance on a task.