Towards Utilising a Range of Neural Activations for Comprehending Representational Associations

Recent efforts to understand intermediate representations in deep neural networks have commonly attempted to label individual neurons and combinations of neurons that make up linear directions in the latent space by examining extremal neuron activations and the highest direction projections. In this paper, we show that this approach, although yielding a good approximation for many purposes, fails to capture valuable information about the behaviour of a representation. Neural network activations are generally dense, and so a more complex, but realistic scenario is that linear directions encode information at various levels of stimulation. We hypothesise that non-extremal level activations contain complex information worth investigating, such as statistical associations, and thus may be used to locate confounding human interpretable concepts. We explore the value of studying a range of neuron activations by taking the case of mid-level output neuron activations and demonstrate on a synthetic dataset how they can inform us about aspects of representations in the penultimate layer not evident through analysing maximal activations alone. We use our findings to develop a method to curate data from mid-range logit samples for retraining to mitigate spurious correlations, or confounding concepts in the penultimate layer, on real benchmark datasets. The success of our method exemplifies the utility of inspecting non-maximal activations to extract complex relationships learned by models.

Bridging the gap in online hate speech detection: a comparative analysis of BERT and traditional models for homophobic content identification on X/Twitter

Our study addresses a significant gap in online hate speech detection research by focusing on homophobia, an area often neglected in sentiment analysis research. Utilising advanced sentiment analysis models, particularly BERT, and traditional machine learning methods, we developed a nuanced approach to identify homophobic content on X/Twitter. This research is pivotal due to the persistent underrepresentation of homophobia in detection models. Our findings reveal that while BERT outperforms traditional methods, the choice of validation technique can impact model performance. This underscores the importance of contextual understanding in detecting nuanced hate speech. By releasing the largest open-source labelled English dataset for homophobia detection known to us, an analysis of various models' performance and our strongest BERT-based model, we aim to enhance online safety and inclusivity. Future work will extend to broader LGBTQIA+ hate speech detection, addressing the challenges of sourcing diverse datasets. Through this endeavour, we contribute to the larger effort against online hate, advocating for a more inclusive digital landscape. Our study not only offers insights into the effective detection of homophobic content by improving on previous research results, but it also lays groundwork for future advancements in hate speech analysis.

On the Detection of Anomalous or Out-Of-Distribution Data in Vision Models Using Statistical Techniques

Out-of-distribution data and anomalous inputs are vulnerabilities of machine learning systems today, often causing systems to make incorrect predictions. The diverse range of data on which these models are used makes detecting atypical inputs a difficult and important task. We assess a tool, Benford's law, as a method used to quantify the difference between real and corrupted inputs. We believe that in many settings, it could function as a filter for anomalous data points and for signalling out-of-distribution data. We hope to open a discussion on these applications and further areas where this technique is underexplored.

UserReg: A Simple but Strong Model for Rating Prediction

Collaborative filtering (CF) has achieved great success in the field of recommender systems. In recent years, many novel CF models, particularly those based on deep learning or graph techniques, have been proposed for a variety of recommendation tasks, such as rating prediction and item ranking. These newly published models usually demonstrate their performance in comparison to baselines or existing models in terms of accuracy improvements. However, others have pointed out that many newly proposed models are not as strong as expected and are outperformed by very simple baselines. This paper proposes a simple linear model based on Matrix Factorization (MF), called UserReg, which regularizes users' latent representations with explicit feedback information for rating prediction. We compare the effectiveness of UserReg with three linear CF models that are widely-used as baselines, and with a set of recently proposed complex models that are based on deep learning or graph techniques. Experimental results show that UserReg achieves overall better performance than the fine-tuned baselines considered and is highly competitive when compared with other recently proposed models. We conclude that UserReg can be used as a strong baseline for future CF research.