The Quest of Finding the Antidote to Sparse Double Descent

In energy-efficient schemes, finding the optimal size of deep learning models is very important and has a broad impact. Meanwhile, recent studies have reported an unexpected phenomenon, the sparse double descent: as the model's sparsity increases, the performance first worsens, then improves, and finally deteriorates. Such a non-monotonic behavior raises serious questions about the optimal model's size to maintain high performance: the model needs to be sufficiently over-parametrized, but having too many parameters wastes training resources. In this paper, we aim to find the best trade-off efficiently. More precisely, we tackle the occurrence of the sparse double descent and present some solutions to avoid it. Firstly, we show that a simple $\ell_2$ regularization method can help to mitigate this phenomenon but sacrifices the performance/sparsity compromise. To overcome this problem, we then introduce a learning scheme in which distilling knowledge regularizes the student model. Supported by experimental results achieved using typical image classification setups, we show that this approach leads to the avoidance of such a phenomenon.

Learn how to Prune Pixels for Multi-view Neural Image-based Synthesis

Image-based rendering techniques stand at the core of an immersive experience for the user, as they generate novel views given a set of multiple input images. Since they have shown good performance in terms of objective and subjective quality, the research community devotes great effort to their improvement. However, the large volume of data necessary to render at the receiver's side hinders applications in limited bandwidth environments or prevents their employment in real-time applications. We present LeHoPP, a method for input pixel pruning, where we examine the importance of each input pixel concerning the rendered view, and we avoid the use of irrelevant pixels. Even without retraining the image-based rendering network, our approach shows a good trade-off between synthesis quality and pixel rate. When tested in the general neural rendering framework, compared to other pruning baselines, LeHoPP gains between $0.9$ dB and $3.6$ dB on average.