Image-based Data Representations of Time Series: A Comparative Analysis in EEG Artifact Detection

Alternative data representations are powerful tools that augment the performance of downstream models. However, there is an abundance of such representations within the machine learning toolbox, and the field lacks a comparative understanding of the suitability of each representation method. In this paper, we propose artifact detection and classification within EEG data as a testbed for profiling image-based data representations of time series data. We then evaluate eleven popular deep learning architectures on each of six commonly-used representation methods. We find that, while the choice of representation entails a choice within the tradeoff between bias and variance, certain representations are practically more effective in highlighting features which increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the data. We present our results on EEG data, and open-source our testing framework to enable future comparative analyses in this vein.

On the Relationship between Skill Neurons and Robustness in Prompt Tuning

Prompt Tuning is a popular parameter-efficient finetuning method for pre-trained large language models (PLMs). Recently, based on experiments with RoBERTa, it has been suggested that Prompt Tuning activates specific neurons in the transformer's feed-forward networks, that are highly predictive and selective for the given task. In this paper, we study the robustness of Prompt Tuning in relation to these "skill neurons", using RoBERTa and T5. We show that prompts tuned for a specific task are transferable to tasks of the same type but are not very robust to adversarial data, with higher robustness for T5 than RoBERTa. At the same time, we replicate the existence of skill neurons in RoBERTa and further show that skill neurons also seem to exist in T5. Interestingly, the skill neurons of T5 determined on non-adversarial data are also among the most predictive neurons on the adversarial data, which is not the case for RoBERTa. We conclude that higher adversarial robustness may be related to a model's ability to activate the relevant skill neurons on adversarial data.