Can We Edit LLMs for Long-Tail Biomedical Knowledge?

Knowledge editing has emerged as an effective approach for updating large language models (LLMs) by modifying their internal knowledge. However, their application to the biomedical domain faces unique challenges due to the long-tailed distribution of biomedical knowledge, where rare and infrequent information is prevalent. In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive study to investigate the effectiveness of knowledge editing methods for editing long-tail biomedical knowledge. Our results indicate that, while existing editing methods can enhance LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, their performance on long-tail knowledge remains inferior to that on high-frequency popular knowledge, even after editing. Our further analysis reveals that long-tail biomedical knowledge contains a significant amount of one-to-many knowledge, where one subject and relation link to multiple objects. This high prevalence of one-to-many knowledge limits the effectiveness of knowledge editing in improving LLMs' understanding of long-tail biomedical knowledge, highlighting the need for tailored strategies to bridge this performance gap.

Generalized Categorisation of Digital Pathology Whole Image Slides using Unsupervised Learning

This project aims to break down large pathology images into small tiles and then cluster those tiles into distinct groups without the knowledge of true labels, our analysis shows how difficult certain aspects of clustering tumorous and non-tumorous cells can be and also shows that comparing the results of different unsupervised approaches is not a trivial task. The project also provides a software package to be used by the digital pathology community, that uses some of the approaches developed to perform unsupervised unsupervised tile classification, which could then be easily manually labelled. The project uses a mixture of techniques ranging from classical clustering algorithms such as K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Models to more complicated feature extraction techniques such as deep Autoencoders and Multi-loss learning. Throughout the project, we attempt to set a benchmark for evaluation using a few measures such as completeness scores and cluster plots. Throughout our results we show that Convolutional Autoencoders manages to slightly outperform the rest of the approaches due to its powerful internal representation learning abilities. Moreover, we show that Gaussian Mixture models produce better results than K-Means on average due to its flexibility in capturing different clusters. We also show the huge difference in the difficulties of classifying different types of pathology textures.