Abstract:In this paper, we review and compare several velocity-level and acceleration-level Pseudo-Inverse-based Path Planning (PPP) and Pseudo-Inverse-based Repetitive Motion Planning (PRMP) schemes based on the kinematic model of robotic manipulators. We show that without unit consistency in the pseudo-inverse computation, path planning of incommensurate robotic manipulators will fail. Also, we investigated the robustness and noise tolerance of six PPP and PRMP schemes in the literature against various noise types (i.e. zero, constant, time-varying and random noises). We compared the simulated results using two redundant robotic manipulators: a 3DoF (2RP), and a 7DoF (2RP4R). These experimental results demonstrate that the improper Generalized Inverse (GI) with arbitrary selection of unit and/or in the presence of noise can lead to unexpected behavior of the robot, while producing wrong instantaneous outputs in the task space, which results in distortions and/or failures in the execution of the planned path. Finally, we propose and demonstrate the efficacy of the Mixed Inverse (MX) as the proper GI to achieve unit-consistency in path planning.
Abstract:Numerical methods for Inverse Kinematics (IK) employ iterative, linear approximations of the IK until the end-effector is brought from its initial pose to the desired final pose. These methods require the computation of the Jacobian of the Forward Kinematics (FK) and its inverse in the linear approximation of the IK. Despite all the successful implementations reported in the literature, Jacobian-based IK methods can still fail to preserve certain useful properties if an improper matrix inverse, e.g. Moore-Penrose (MP), is employed for incommensurate robotic systems. In this paper, we propose a systematic, robust and accurate numerical solution for the IK problem using the Mixed (MX) Generalized Inverse (GI) applied to any type of Jacobians (e.g., analytical, numerical or geometric) derived for any commensurate and incommensurate robot. This approach is robust to whether the system is under-determined (less than 6 DoF) or over-determined (more than 6 DoF). We investigate six robotics manipulators with various Degrees of Freedom (DoF) to demonstrate that commonly used GI's fail to guarantee the same system behaviors when the units are varied for incommensurate robotics manipulators. In addition, we evaluate the proposed methodology as a global IK solver and compare against well-known IK methods for redundant manipulators. Based on the experimental results, we conclude that the right choice of GI is crucial in preserving certain properties of the system (i.e. unit-consistency).