Personalizing explanations of AI-driven hints to users' cognitive abilities: an empirical evaluation

We investigate personalizing the explanations that an Intelligent Tutoring System generates to justify the hints it provides to students to foster their learning. The personalization targets students with low levels of two traits, Need for Cognition and Conscientiousness, and aims to enhance these students' engagement with the explanations, based on prior findings that these students do not naturally engage with the explanations but they would benefit from them if they do. To evaluate the effectiveness of the personalization, we conducted a user study where we found that our proposed personalization significantly increases our target users' interaction with the hint explanations, their understanding of the hints and their learning. Hence, this work provides valuable insights into effectively personalizing AI-driven explanations for cognitively demanding tasks such as learning.

Classification of Alzheimers Disease with Deep Learning on Eye-tracking Data

Existing research has shown the potential of classifying Alzheimers Disease (AD) from eye-tracking (ET) data with classifiers that rely on task-specific engineered features. In this paper, we investigate whether we can improve on existing results by using a Deep-Learning classifier trained end-to-end on raw ET data. This classifier (VTNet) uses a GRU and a CNN in parallel to leverage both visual (V) and temporal (T) representations of ET data and was previously used to detect user confusion while processing visual displays. A main challenge in applying VTNet to our target AD classification task is that the available ET data sequences are much longer than those used in the previous confusion detection task, pushing the limits of what is manageable by LSTM-based models. We discuss how we address this challenge and show that VTNet outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches in AD classification, providing encouraging evidence on the generality of this model to make predictions from ET data.

Evaluating the overall sensitivity of saliency-based explanation methods

We address the need to generate faithful explanations of "black box" Deep Learning models. Several tests have been proposed to determine aspects of faithfulness of explanation methods, but they lack cross-domain applicability and a rigorous methodology. Hence, we select an existing test that is model agnostic and is well-suited for comparing one aspect of faithfulness (i.e., sensitivity) of multiple explanation methods, and extend it by specifying formal thresh-olds and building criteria to determine the over-all sensitivity of the explanation method. We present examples of how multiple explanation methods for Convolutional Neural Networks can be compared using this extended methodology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between sensitivity and faithfulness and consider how the test can be adapted to assess different explanation methods in other domains.