Benchmarking a Benchmark: How Reliable is MS-COCO?

Benchmark datasets are used to profile and compare algorithms across a variety of tasks, ranging from image classification to segmentation, and also play a large role in image pretraining algorithms. Emphasis is placed on results with little regard to the actual content within the dataset. It is important to question what kind of information is being learned from these datasets and what are the nuances and biases within them. In the following work, Sama-COCO, a re-annotation of MS-COCO, is used to discover potential biases by leveraging a shape analysis pipeline. A model is trained and evaluated on both datasets to examine the impact of different annotation conditions. Results demonstrate that annotation styles are important and that annotation pipelines should closely consider the task of interest. The dataset is made publicly available at https://www.sama.com/sama-coco-dataset/ .

An Empirical Study of Uncertainty in Polygon Annotation and the Impact of Quality Assurance

Polygons are a common annotation format used for quickly annotating objects in instance segmentation tasks. However, many real-world annotation projects request near pixel-perfect labels. While strict pixel guidelines may appear to be the solution to a successful project, practitioners often fail to assess the feasibility of the work requested, and overlook common factors that may challenge the notion of quality. This paper aims to examine and quantify the inherent uncertainty for polygon annotations and the role that quality assurance plays in minimizing its effect. To this end, we conduct an analysis on multi-rater polygon annotations for several objects from the MS-COCO dataset. The results demonstrate that the reliability of a polygon annotation is dependent on a reviewing procedure, as well as the scene and shape complexity.