Developing a Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool for Uterine Tumor Imaging

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare but aggressive malignancy. On imaging, it is difficult to differentiate LMS from, for example, degenerated leiomyoma (LM), a prevalent but benign condition. We curated a data set of 115 axial T2-weighted MRI images from 110 patients (mean [range] age=45 [17-81] years) with UTs that included five different tumor types. These data were randomly split stratifying on tumor volume into training (n=85) and test sets (n=30). An independent second reader (reader 2) provided manual segmentations for all test set images. To automate segmentation, we applied nnU-Net and explored the effect of training set size on performance by randomly generating subsets with 25, 45, 65 and 85 training set images. We evaluated the ability of radiomic features to distinguish between types of UT individually and when combined through feature selection and machine learning. Using the entire training set the mean [95% CI] fibroid DSC was measured as 0.87 [0.59-1.00] and the agreement between the two readers was 0.89 [0.77-1.0] on the test set. When classifying degenerated LM from LMS we achieve a test set F1-score of 0.80. Classifying UTs based on radiomic features we identify classifiers achieving F1-scores of 0.53 [0.45, 0.61] and 0.80 [0.80, 0.80] on the test set for the benign versus malignant, and degenerated LM versus LMS tasks. We show that it is possible to develop an automated method for 3D segmentation of the uterus and UT that is close to human-level performance with fewer than 150 annotated images. For distinguishing UT types, while we train models that merit further investigation with additional data, reliable automatic differentiation of UTs remains a challenge.

Reproducibility in medical image radiomic studies: contribution of dynamic histogram binning

The de facto standard of dynamic histogram binning for radiomic feature extraction leads to an elevated sensitivity to fluctuations in annotated regions. This may impact the majority of radiomic studies published recently and contribute to issues regarding poor reproducibility of radiomic-based machine learning that has led to significant efforts for data harmonization; however, we believe the issues highlighted here are comparatively neglected, but often remedied by choosing static binning. The field of radiomics has improved through the development of community standards and open-source libraries such as PyRadiomics. But differences in image acquisition, systematic differences between observers' annotations, and preprocessing steps still pose challenges. These can change the distribution of voxels altering extracted features and can be exacerbated with dynamic binning.