Abstract:This paper addresses the problem of uplink transmit power optimization in distributed massive multiple-input multiple-output systems, where remote radio heads (RRHs) are equipped with 1-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). First, in a scenario where a single RRH serves a single user equipment (UE), the signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio (SNDR) is shown to be a non-monotonic and unimodal function of the UE transmit power due to the quantization distortion (QD). Upon the introduction of multiple RRHs, adding properly tuned dithering at each RRH is shown to render the SNDR at the output of the joint receiver unimodal. In a scenario with multiple RRHs and UEs, considering the non-monotonic nature of the signal-to-interference-plus-noise-and-distortion ratio (SINDR), both the UE transmit powers and the RRH dithering levels are jointly optimized subject to the min-power and max-min-SINDR criteria, while employing Bussgang-based maximum ratio combining (BMRC) and minimum mean squared error (BMMSE) receivers. To this end, gradient and block coordinate descent methods are introduced to tune the UE transmit powers, whereas a line search coupled with gradient updates is used to adjust the RRH dithering levels. Numerical results demonstrate that jointly optimizing the UE transmit power and the RRH dithering levels can significantly enhance the system performance, thus facilitating joint reception from multiple RRHs across a range of scenarios. Comparing the BMMSE and BMRC receivers, the former offers a better interference and QD alleviation while the latter has a lower computational complexity.
Abstract:We consider a cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output system with multi-antenna access points (APs) and user equipments (UEs), where the UEs can be served in both the downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) within a resource block. We tackle the combined optimization of the DL precoders and combiners at the APs and DL UEs, respectively, together with the UL combiners and precoders at the APs and UL UEs, respectively. To this end, we propose distributed beamforming designs enabled by iterative bi-directional training (IBT) and based on the minimum mean squared error criterion. To reduce the IBT overhead and thus enhance the effective DL and UL rates, we carry out the distributed beamforming design by assuming that all the UEs are served solely in the DL and then utilize the obtained beamformers for the DL and UL data transmissions after proper scaling. Numerical results show the superiority of the proposed combined DL-UL distributed beamforming design over separate DL and UL designs, especially with short resource blocks.
Abstract:We propose uplink power control (PC) methods for massive multiple-input multiple-output systems with 1-bit analog-to-digital converters, which are specifically tailored to address the non-monotonic data detection performance with respect to the transmit power of the user equipment (UE). Considering a single UE, we design a multi-amplitude pilot sequence to capture the aforementioned non-monotonicity, which is utilized at the base station to derive UE transmit power adjustments via single-shot or differential power control (DPC) techniques. Both methods enable closed-loop uplink PC using different feedback approaches. The single-shot method employs one-time multi-bit feedback, while the DPC method relies on continuous adjustments with 1-bit feedback. Numerical results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed schemes over conventional closed-loop uplink PC techniques.
Abstract:We consider the problem of uplink power control for distributed massive multiple-input multiple-output systems where the base stations (BSs) are equipped with 1-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). The scenario with a single-user equipment (UE) is first considered to provide insights into the signal-tonoise-and-distortion ratio (SNDR). With a single BS, the SNDR is a unimodal function of the UE transmit power. With multiple BSs, the SNDR at the output of the joint combiner can be made unimodal by adding properly tuned dithering at each BS. As a result, the UE can be effectively served by multiple BSs with 1-bit ADCs. Considering the signal-to-interference-plus-noise-anddistortion ratio (SINDR) in the multi-UE scenario, we aim at optimizing the UE transmit powers and the dithering at each BS based on the min-power and max-min-SINDR criteria. To this end, we propose three algorithms with different convergence and complexity properties. Numerical results show that, if the desired SINDR can only be achieved via joint combining across multiple BSs with properly tuned dithering, the optimal UE transmit power is imposed by the distance to the farthest serving BS (unlike in the unquantized case). In this context, dithering plays a crucial role in enhancing the SINDR, especially for UEs with significant path loss disparity among the serving BSs.
Abstract:We propose fully distributed multi-group multicast precoding designs for cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems with modest training overhead. We target the minimization of the sum of the maximum mean squared errors (MSEs) over the multicast groups, which is then approximated with a weighted sum MSE minimization to simplify the computation and signaling. To design the joint network-wide multi-group multicast precoders at the base stations (BSs) and the combiners at the user equipments (UEs) in a fully distributed fashion, we adopt an iterative bi-directional training scheme with UE-specific or group-specific precoded uplink pilots and group-specific precoded downlink pilots. To this end, we introduce a new group-specific uplink training resource that entirely eliminates the need for backhaul signaling for the channel state information (CSI) exchange. The precoders are optimized locally at each BS by means of either best-response or gradient-based updates, and the convergence of the two approaches is analyzed with respect to the centralized implementation with perfect CSI. Finally, numerical results show that the proposed distributed methods greatly outperform conventional cell-free massive MIMO precoding designs that rely solely on local CSI.
Abstract:We consider multi-group multicast precoding designs for cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. To optimize the transmit and receive beamforming strategies, we focus on minimizing the sum of the maximum mean squared errors (MSEs) over the multicast groups, which is then approximated with the sum MSE to simplify the computation and signaling. We adopt an iterative bi-directional training scheme with uplink and downlink precoded pilots to cooperatively design the multi-group multicast precoders at each base station and the combiners at each user equipment in a distributed fashion. An additional group-specific uplink training resource is introduced, which entirely eliminates the need for backhaul signaling for channel state information (CSI) exchange. We also propose a simpler distributed precoding design based solely on group-specific pilots, which can be useful in the case of scarce training resources. Numerical results show that the proposed distributed methods greatly outperform conventional cell-free massive MIMO precoding designs that rely solely on local CSI.
Abstract:In cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, the beamforming strategies at the base stations (BSs) and user equipments (UEs) can be computed building on bi-directional training. However, the precoding/decoding optimization in the downlink (DL) and in the uplink (UL) generally requires two separate bi-directional training phases, which can be wasteful in the case of short scheduling blocks. This paper proposes a framework to reduce the bi-directional training overhead by considering a common beamforming training strategy for both DL and UL when the UEs to be served in the two directions are the same. In doing so, we consider the problem of maximizing the (weighted) minimum DL-UL rate among all the UEs. Numerical results show that, in scenarios with short scheduling blocks, the proposed framework outperforms the case where the DL and UL beamforming strategies are computed individually via two separate bi-directional training phases thanks to the reduced training overhead. Even more substantial gains are observed with respect to the case with a single bi-directional training phase, where the DL (resp. UL) beamforming strategies are reused in the UL (resp. DL).